New shim module src/shim/hooks/ai_orders.{h,cpp}: one register-transparent entry
stub on StrategySim::ApplyTurnCommandBatch dumps every submitted TurnCommands block
(six gates, 27 list lengths, element bytes) at the point where all of them are
complete in memory; sixteen entry probes, with RunTaskList's stub recording the
pass so every later hit is pass-attributed.
Two workloads on VM145, one End Turn each. The rule-19 control passed with all
seventeen detours installed: both autosaves byte-identical to the published oracle.
What the AI actually emits, and three things no reading had produced:
- a list-23 element on EVERY turn, the first element ever observed in the free
half of the cost table -- and both turns still cost the measured 12;
- the ids in AI commands are client-allocated and travel in the command (design
18, fleet 34; neither exists in the input save);
- pass 0 emits nothing, measured from element counts rather than inferred.
tests/game_ai/test_live_blocks.cpp rebuilds both captured blocks through the public
OrderClient API and asserts the list profile, element values, gate counts and
ModCount total: 44 checks. Kept separate from test_orders.cpp, which stays the
record of what static reading predicted.
Gates: clean_room_check OK, host ctest 55/55, CT111 shim cross-build exit 0.
`ComputeBudget`'s savings-interest term is now compared against the running game at
a treasury the corpus actually contains. Three runs on VM146 from turn1-state.sav:
A (widened floats, as shipped) 3,895 calls, 0 diverged, 0 undeclared writes
B (exact decimals, the control) 2,718 calls, 1,359 diverged
The game fills savingsInterest with 499 at a treasury of 50,000, and with 380 at
38,100 -- the exact decimals pay 500 and 381. Every divergence in B lands on a
treasury that is a multiple of 100 and no other state diverges at all, which is
exactly the arithmetic. G3's rule-23 reading is now measured, not inferred, and the
one-money error is shown to propagate into `available` and `researchMoney` too.
The control also settles why the earlier 4,437-call green run was green: slot 5 IS
diffed and the harness CAN see it, so that run simply presented no boundary state.
Coverage is therefore reported as distinct states, not calls: 5 distinct treasuries,
2 of them on the boundary.
Two further rule-23 constants found in the same routine by an operand-width sweep,
corrected, and honestly marked UNVERIFIED because no reference turn can see them:
- the research-yield factor is a widened 0.85f while its two neighbours in the
same product are exact doubles. Boundary: research money a multiple of 40,000;
the run presented 9 distinct values and none is.
- the three research modifiers are summed in single precision, not double.
Boundary: two of the three non-zero; the corpus has shrm = TRM = 0.
Both are pinned by boundary cases in test_economy.cpp that fail with the decimals.
Also verified live, in the same run:
- T31's difficulty-column recovery. The live ServerPlayer+0xf9 / NPC flags on all
eight players are exactly what lane PL's save-only inversion claims, including
the awkward system-owning player that is still ambiguous because it is an NPC.
- BANKRUPTCY_PROTECTION_LIMIT_FACTOR reads 3.29999995 = (float)3.3. Its file image
is zero because the loader fills it at run time, so lane PL-3 had to assume the
value; it is now measured and the assumption was right.
Falsified, and recorded as such: the difficulty-mods record does NOT sit inline at
ServerPlayer+0x36c -- that field is a heap pointer on all eight players. The row IS
reachable from a ServerPlayer (which corrects the hook's standing coverage note),
but the fitted {3.0,1.5}/{1.0,1.0} pair remains unverified. The hook logs the
pointer and does not follow it.
The `verified` column stays 0, deliberately. Every phase this compare touches is
Partial for reasons upstream of it, and promoting one because part of it was checked
is the drift app_test_catalog exists to catch. What moved is models; see
docs/L5-live-verification.md for each one with its coverage.
Gates run separately: clean-room OK, host ctest 54/54, CT111 shim cross-build exit 0.
Lane SV recovered the script-object subsystem statically and predicted that
SVSOSwarmQueen::RegisterHives takes one RNG_NextInt per new hive inside
StrategyServer::BeginProcessTurn -- which runs inside lane Z's autosave bracket
and outside every one of its subtotals, so a draw there had never been
attributed by anything.
Five nested trace hooks, each declaring the strategic generator as a region and
each carrying a model evaluated at entry so the record can disagree with it:
StrategyServer::BeginProcessTurn the unhooked interval, plus a region
over Frame so the increment is a fact
SVSOSwarmQueen::OnTurnBegin evt 0x13, vtable slot +0x60
SVSOSwarmQueen::RegisterHives predict_new_hives from the original's
own two predicates; reads the LO/HI
config pointers live
SVSOSwarmQueen::TickHives the NextQ slip and its three gates
SVSOSlaversRefuel::UpdateDifficultyTier tail phase 20; a 4-byte region over
CDiff so a store and its ABSENCE are
distinguishable (method rule 20)
Also watch.mode=snlv: one arming line moves slot 1 from the NVO map's _Mysize to
the target system's SnLv, and the arming sweep now prints SnLv with its decoded
per-player 2-bit levels for every system, which costs no debug register.
Measured on VM140: hive creation costs 2 words in BeginProcessTurn and the
residual outside the two turn drivers is 2, not 0; the next turn it is 0 again.
LO=20 HI=30. Spica's SnLv reads 0x200 with AFlags 0. The oracle reproduced
byte for byte with every one of these detours live.
Predictions and outcomes: docs/L1-predictions.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARBgSooAfokKUy6wKUKEyZ
`SvSctOb` is not written by direct calls. Every update goes through an event bus: a
driver notifies the root object with an integer id, the root fans the delivery out to
every child, and each delivery is two steps -- a generic handler that takes the id, then
one event-specific vtable slot that does not. The id -> slot map is a 33-entry jump table
in the image, so which class reacts to which event is recovered and exhaustive rather than
inferred from what the saves happen to show. Five of the 33 rows are not in slot order,
including two the tail sends.
Three handlers write the eight leaves that diverged:
* the slavers' difficulty tier, on the tail's end-of-turn delivery -- a three-record
stack table scanned against the frame, boundaries 1/50/100, stored only on a change,
and at frame 100 and above the scan runs off the end and stores nothing, so the tier
can never reach 2;
* the refugees' one-shot latch, on the turn-begin delivery, with a design instantiation
behind the same latch that nothing here can do;
* the swarm queen's hives, also at turn begin, registered on the systems carrying the
SWARM's scenario tag (the queen's constructor stores 3 for that and 10 for its own
encounter id) and then ticked -- and the tick is the whole explanation of a target
turn that reads 31 after one turn and 32 after the next. It is not re-rolled; it slips
forward by one every turn the spawn gates stay shut.
New host phase H03 for the turn-begin delivery, run right after the frame counter where
the original sends it, and tail phase T20 implemented. Rules are pure in game/sim.
Measured on CT111, closed and regressed stated separately:
default turn1->turn2 209 -> 126 (was 128) closed 83, regressed 0
turn2->turn3 108 -> 67 (was 69) closed 41, regressed 0
--commit-blocked=H03 turn1->turn2 209 -> 124 closed 87, regressed 2
turn2->turn3 108 -> 67 closed 41, regressed 0
Registering a hive closes the four leaves that say which systems have hives and that they
have no queens, and opens two carrying a target turn known to be wrong: the original draws
it from the strategic generator inside the turn-begin step, outside both turn drivers, and
neither the two data-file constants nor the generator's position there is settled. That
trade is a flag, not a default.
The prediction in docs/SV-script-objects.md was committed before the build, and P5 was
wrong: it called the second pair a null control, and the second pair is where the slip
rule is tested EXACTLY -- two hives, two target turns, both landing on the oracle with no
draw and no fitting.
Gates run separately: clean-room OK, host ctest 51/51, CT111 shim cross-build clean.
The prediction text is unchanged; only the decompiler-style identifier is replaced with the name
lane E3 had already recorded for it. Rule 13's gate did exactly its job on a doc that had been
committed before the build.
Second mode in lane W2's watchpoint module. No second hook: only different arithmetic on the S the
ApplyAllTurnCommands detour already holds.
- picks the target system by predicate at arm time (AFlags == 0, NVO non-empty) and logs all 28
systems, so the choice is auditable rather than a hard-coded pointer;
- probes both candidate ServerSystem bases and logs how many systems validate under each, which
settled a documentation dispute (+0x274: 9, +0x26c: 0) by measurement;
- prints the trade-route and spy-program vector triples, which is the workload-confirmation
instrument two earlier lanes lacked.
Rule 19 control passed: the armed run reproduced the determinism oracle byte for byte.
Closed 2 on the reference pair and 4 on pair 2, regressed 0, with no operator
input. Measured, both pairs, never netted.
- S00 stamps PvSav from Sav on every live player, before any phase can move it.
0 closed on pair 1 (a no-op there), 2 on pair 2.
- T31 recovers the per-player difficulty column by recomputing BnkEl from the
colony state the input save was written from and comparing against the BnkEl
the save carries. That removes the --ai-player flag as a blocker and turns the
phase's self-check into a real one: it used to compare its POST-turn result
against the PRE-turn stored value, so its 6-of-8 only ever covered the six
players whose limit does not move. The load-time check passes for every live
player of all eleven corpus saves. T31 Blocked -> Partial; BnkPr still needs
the tuning constant.
- BANKRUPTCY_PROTECTION_LIMIT_FACTOR is multiplied in as fmul dword ptr, so it
is a float32 in the image; the engine narrows it now. Zero leaves move on this
corpus -- all seven of its BnkPr records land where the two constants agree --
and three hand-written test expectations moved (rule 23).
docs/PL-players-residual.md carries the decomposition, the predictions written
before the build, where they were wrong, and the ranked remainder.
Adds the half of the AI's turn that is arithmetic rather than judgement: what an
order looks like in the command block, which orders advance the save's
modification counter and by how much, and the phase/pass skeleton the decisions
hang in.
The counter's per-command cost turns out to have a sharp boundary. Applying an
element of command lists 1..16 advances it; applying an element of lists 17..27
does not, and one of the six flag-gated single commands is free as well. So a
uniform per-element cost model is wrong on any turn that touches the free half.
Two behaviours here are not conveniences and change the output:
* every submitted block costs at least one, because the send-buffer build sets
the research-rate gate unconditionally whatever the player did. On a quiet
board that is the largest term in the turn's delta -- four of the ten command
bumps on the reference turn are exactly this, and one of the four is the
human's;
* an AI fleet order costs three where the interface's costs two, because the
AI's bridge issues the fleet-task command twice, mode 0 then mode 1, and the
adder keys on (fleet, mode).
The phase spine records the one thing a literal port gets wrong: the turn submits
at phase 28 of 34, the submit latches the client closed before it builds the send
buffer, and every order the last five phases issue -- one of which is a colonize
order -- is refused. Tested through the client rather than by asserting a flag.
The task walk reproduces the two passes: rank once, walk twice, and refuse every
write in the first pass at the client rather than trusting the caller to check.
Nothing here decides anything. Which tasks exist and what each one wants are
questions about the board, and no part of this models the board; the module
supplies the order API, the pass gate and the cost function, and a caller
supplies the decisions.
game/ai tests 233 -> 423 checks; ctest 51/51 -> 53/53. Not linked into the
standalone driver, whose divergence on the reference pair is unchanged at 128.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARBgSooAfokKUy6wKUKEyZ
Reference pair turn1->turn2: 81 leaves closed, 0 regressed (was 78/0).
Pair turn2->turn3: 39 closed, 0 regressed (was 36/0). With
--commit-blocked=T31 --ai-player 1: 83/0 and 41/0.
game/sim/colony: GrowCivilianPopulations models ServerSystem's civilian
growth sub-pass. The whole system's delta is clamped to 20,000,000 -- an
int64 column of the population-type table, built in the executable from
its own literals -- and on both reference pairs that clamp, not the growth
curve and not any carrying capacity, is what decides the value: the
uncapped delta is 7.5x it and the capacity headroom 25x it. So the pass
commits with no tuning table loaded, and says by how much each unmodelled
input would have to be wrong before it mattered.
The one input genuinely off the wire is the per-species civilian capacity
factor. It is handled by running the pass twice, once with the modelled
capacity and once with the system's own wire-known dcs limit, and
committing only when the two agree. Imperial growth is deliberately NOT
committed: it is a no-op on this corpus and would need a capacity the
corpus can bound from below but not from above.
game/sim/economy: both interest rates in ComputeBudget are WIDENED FLOAT
literals, (double)0.01f and (double)0.15f, and are then truncated -- so a
treasury of exactly 50,000 earns 499, not 500. This module used the exact
decimals, which left the human's savings one money high on the first
reference pair and exact on the second. Sixteen hand-computed test
expectations moved by one; they were derived from the model, not measured.
The live ComputeBudget compare (4,437 calls, 0 divergences) did not catch
this because it presented only 20 distinct states and none sat on a
rounding boundary.
game/sim/colony: ShipRepairCost, the last unmodelled input of the output
turn path. The demand is still 0 -- its two design fields are cached stats
the save does not carry -- but the zero is now evidenced rather than
silent: S13 reports the candidate set, and the independent colony keeps a
ten-ship fleet over a colony whose savings close exactly at zero demand.
Gates run as separate commands: clean-room OK, host ctest 49/49, and the
CT111 shim cross-build exit 0 (required: game/sim is compiled into the
shim). The host build and report were also re-run on CT111 and produced
identical numbers.
docs/G3-civilian-growth.md; notes repo
findings/subsystems/population-growth.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARBgSooAfokKUy6wKUKEyZ
The engine has modelled the event log since lane E, but the standalone never wrote
any of it into the save it produces. This wires the two together for the one event
on the reference pair the standalone can compute, and corrects the condition.
What a turn actually posts, measured over all eleven saves: two events on
turn1 -> turn2 and three on turn2 -> turn3, and only two players in the whole
corpus ever hold an event at all. Order is readable off the ids -- the build pass
posts before the research pass. See docs/EV-events.md section 1.
The condition had two of the original's three tests. The missing one is "no tech
finished on this turn or later", and it is what keeps the event off the turn a tech
lands; zuul-turn23 exercises it. The third input, whether the player holds a target
at the moment of the check, is not on the wire -- three of the four real players
acquire one during the turn, which is AI research selection -- so the operator's
--ai-player roster stands in for it as a stated hypothesis and the phase stays
blocked without it.
No prose in the engine: the record's text is resolved through a caller-supplied
lookup over the operator's own installed string table, and a run without a data
root posts nothing rather than writing a record it cannot fill.
Measured (CT111 host build, real data root), closed and regressed never netted:
turn1 -> turn2 209 -> 127 closed 82 (+4 this lane), regressed 0
turn2 -> turn3 108 -> 69 closed 39 (+3 this lane), regressed 0
The posted record agrees with the oracle on all eight of its fields. Controls: with
the roster withheld the phase over-fires and regresses 16 leaves on pair 1; with the
string table withheld it posts nothing and regresses none.
Gates run separately: tools/clean_room_check.sh OK; host ctest 50/50; CT111 shim
cross-build OK (exports 66 names identical to binkw32.dll, staged in
/srv/re-lab/shim/dist-ev); CT111 host ctest 50/50.
209 -> 158 (closed 51, regressed 0) and 108 -> 87 (closed 21, regressed 0), identical to the
pre-lane baseline, measured on CT111. Falsification hypotheses 1 and 2 refuted by measurement
(three empty BQ frames per reference save, every hbq false, the one command block empty);
hypothesis 3 refuted by the corpus oracle; hypothesis 4 stands as a labelled hypothesis.
construction.h also carries the ship/fleet birth shape as read but NOT implemented, with the
reason stated: the newborn hull copies four cached stat words the engine does not yet compute.
`ComputeBudget` takes a system's money from two different functions. Projected mode
calls `ComputeMaxIncome`, which lane E1 closed 25/25 against the BnkEl oracle. The
TURN calls `ComputeOutput` with the system's own rate sliders, where the build queue,
the ship-repair pass and the infrastructure -> terraform -> money cascade are all
live and E1's proof that the cascades are zero does not apply.
Read from the instruction stream, both ranges disassembled to the next function start:
* `sim::ComputeSystemOutput` -- the channel algebra of `ComputeOutputFromRates`, with
every rounding site (round-half-even per channel, truncating for the construction
and money slots) and the association of every x87 sum as the original has them.
* `sim::IdealSuitability` -- the owner's own field, the server's species baseline for
an independent colony, and the per-system `dsu` override.
* `sim::RepairShipsInOrbit` -- the round robin, which is provably equivalent to
`points - min(points, demand)`: the per-pass share is at least 1, so the only early
exit needs every remaining cost to be zero.
* two corrections to `ConstructionPoints` and `SplitLeftover`: the station bonus is
ignored unless strictly positive and its association is `k x (b x cons) + cons`, and
the leftover weights sum as `wi + (wf + wt)`.
The load-bearing fact: the leftover construction points come back to the TRADE
channel, so a colony with an empty build queue earns the same money whichever way its
sliders point. The engine now runs both paths on every load and reports the
difference; on the 11-save corpus every delta decomposes to the unit into the build
queue's points priced through the money chain.
P01/P02 move from blocked to partial and are committed:
turn1-state -> turn2-state 209 -> 157 closed 52 regressed 0 (was 51 / 0)
turn2-state -> turn3-state 108 -> 86 closed 22 regressed 0 (was 21 / 0)
One leaf per pair, and it is the easy one: the independent colony, whose population
does not grow and whose orders the turn does not change. The human's savings are
still short by the civilian growth `S11` does not commit, and the AI's by its own
orders. The ship-repair demand is taken as 0 because `Ship::RepairCost` is unread.
sots-re: findings/subsystems/output-turn-path.md, ghidra/addresses.d/lane-c3.json
H02 StampTreatyTurns -- the diplomacy ledger's "this treaty was last in force on turn
N" stamp, over every ordered pair of players that holds one, creating the entry on
demand. It is a host step, not a phase of either turn driver: its sole caller is the
command-application step, which runs after the frame counter has advanced and before
both drivers. On a turn with no combat and no diplomatic command it is the only writer
of these fields, which is why a whole per-player dipstats vector is its output.
Read from the instruction stream; three things an earlier reading had wrong are
corrected in findings/subsystems/treaty-turn-stamp.md: the stamped value is the TURN and
not the modification counter, the relation codes are 3=allied / 2=NAP / 1=cease-fire and
not the reverse, and the bit is the player's index field rather than its position in the
player vector -- the opposite convention from the shared-vision mask two files away.
Measured, closed and regressed reported separately and never netted:
turn1 -> turn2 (reference) 209 -> 132 closed 77 (was 51), regressed 0
turn2 -> turn3 108 -> 73 closed 35 (was 21), regressed 0
human-turn2 -> turn3 closed 76 (was 64), regressed 0
zuul-turn15 -> turn16 closed 30 (was 18), regressed 0
zuul-turn16 -> turn17 closed 29 (was 17), regressed 0
The last three are pairs from a different game at turns 2, 15 and 16 that the model was
never fitted to, and it closes exactly the twelve ordered treaty pairs each of them holds.
The rule also reproduces the ledger of ten of the eleven corpus saves entry for entry,
including each entry's order and every stamped value; the eleventh is the turn-1 save
whose ledger no turn has yet written, and it is the reference pair's input.
app_test_treaty pins the five things the corpus cannot separate: the relation codes (no
save exercises cease-fire), the bit's source, the missing alliance-id guard, the -1
initialiser on a fresh entry, and the append-at-the-end order that makes re-running the
step idempotent instead of duplicating rows.
The betrayal half of the same function needs the turn's diplomatic commands; with no
command stream it is provably a no-op and is not modelled.
First module of game/ai, and the first piece of Rung B that is not scaffolding. It is the two
halves of the AI's task selection that are pure: the 33-value task type enumeration and the
ranking that decides which goal the AI acts on first.
* the priority table, verbatim -- higher runs first, and it is the entire default policy;
* the five overrides, kept out of the table on purpose. The two artifact tasks ignore their
table entries (1 and 2) and return 1260/1261; a port that only copied the table would rank
them last instead of fourth and fifth. The two tuned invade priorities are INPUTS
(TaskPriorityPolicy), not constants, because their loader is not yet identified;
* Rank() as a stable descending sort. The original sorts a std::list, so stability is the
behaviour, not a choice -- ties keep creation order;
* CreationOrder(species, policyNonZero), because that is what breaks the ties. Four arms: the
NPC species builds nothing, Hiver is the only arm with the gate families, Zuul the only one
with NodeBore, everyone else shares a fourth. Both defensive families are gated on the
player's policy value and DefendGateIncoming is Hiver-only on top of that.
193 checks in tests/game_ai, every expected value read off the original's tables rather than
produced by running this code. ctest 46/46 -> 47/47; clean-room check OK.
Derivation: sots-re findings/subsystems/ai-task-system.md (lane AI2), sections 1-3.
game/sim/construction.{h,cpp}: Game::ShipRecords (four per-hull-class arrays plus the
per-design vector, sized by ENUMERATION against the wire, not by what the code touches)
and the completion bookkeeping BuildQueue::ProcessTurn performs -- the per-class built
counter, whose indexed increment has EXACTLY ONE writer in the whole image, and the
find-or-append per-design record keyed by the design's object id. RunSystemConstruction
wraps the point pass and keeps each completion's design id, which the point pass alone
does not report.
game/sim/colony: corrected from the instruction stream -- with points <= 0 the entry test
branches to the epilogue, so the REMOVAL SWEEP IS SKIPPED TOO. Carried as a labelled
hypothesis: no corpus save can reach the state that shows it.
app/construction_phase.{h,cpp}: S11's build-queue sub-pass, reported on its own line
because what blocks it is not what blocks the rest of the colony turn. It is blocked on
the per-system output term for points; it is NOT what the archived ship census waits on.
tests/game_sim/test_construction.cpp: 65 checks, including a corpus oracle the campaign
already owned and had not noticed -- zuul-turn16-noderoute -> zuul-turn17-rollpending is a
real consecutive-turn pair in which six orders complete and one is partially advanced.
The test SOLVES for the point total rather than assuming it, so a non-FIFO order, a
per-order budget or skip-instead-of-stop each falsify it.
Written before any code (earned rule 2). Both reference saves carry three BQ frames with
zero orders, every hbq false and the only TurnCommands_v5 block empty, so the pass has
nothing to advance; the archived destroyer is created inside the turn by the AI. Includes
the falsification list and names the oracle pair the campaign already owns.
The second chain ComputeBudget needs. The output term (lane N) is a system's
OUTPUT; what the budget and the bankruptcy limits sum is its MONEY, which runs
that total through TradePointsToMoney. Read instruction by instruction, every
range disassembled to the next function start.
The income law is not the output law with a different constant: money per head
is typeIncomeMod / 14000 -- no 1.8, no 500000 -- and it truncates TWICE per
(group, species) row, once inside the per-row term and once after the morale and
addiction factors. Summing the species first and truncating once is wrong on any
colony with more than one species.
The multiplier that was "not on the wire" (formula-gaps.md Q3) resolves to a
three-row table the executable BUILDS IN CODE from .rdata float literals, exactly
like lane N's pop-type table: {int id; float ai[3]; float other[3]}, selected per
player by is-AI && !NPC. Every corpus save carries aidf == 1, whose AI income
column is 1.1f -- the x1.1 the BnkEl oracle measured. Its other two columns are a
fleet-maintenance divisor and a research multiplier, both of which already had a
home in BudgetInputs and no source.
Verified against the 25-record BnkEl oracle, which inverts the stored limit to
the true sum and therefore needs no VM: 6/25 before, 25/25 after. Falsified three
ways -- moving the AI flag off the AI players costs 11 records, moving it onto the
humans costs the other 11, and forcing one species' resource pair on all of them
costs every Zuul record.
app: T31 UpdateBankruptcyLimits now runs the whole roll-up and self-checks it
every run against the BnkEl the input save already carries -- 8 of 8 players on
turn1-state with --ai-player 1. It stays blocked on two things that are not the
formula: ServerPlayer+0xf9 (is this player AI?) is a game-setup input the save
does not carry, and BnkPr needs BANKRUPTCY_PROTECTION_LIMIT_FACTOR from the data
files. Committing it closes nothing on the reference pair -- the limits move
because the CIVILIAN POPULATION grows and that growth is not committed -- so
measured with --commit-blocked=T31 --ai-player 1: 0 closed, 0 REGRESSED, i.e.
209 -> 204 and 108 -> 103 unchanged.
P01 is NOT unblocked, and the roadmap's item 1 was wrong about that: ComputeBudget
takes its per-system money from ComputeOutput with the system's OWN rate sliders,
not from ComputeMaxIncome. Only its projected mode uses the max-income form. On
the turn path the repair pass runs and the unspent-industry and
unspent-terraforming cascades into the money channel are live, so the proof that
both are zero does not apply. The catalog text says so now.
Two things the 25/25 does NOT cover, and they are labelled in the code: the
suitability money cost is multiplied by zero on every corpus colony (all sit at
their species' ideal), and the slave, addiction, morale, station and
capacity-surplus branches are unexercised.
