Reword the disclosure line to drop a personal name

The opening disclosure named the human twice. Its actual work -- saying
that this was drafted by an agent and cleared by a person, which section 6
then asks whether to make a rule -- survives without the name, so it now
reads: drafted by an agent on this side; the human here read it before it
went up.

Corrected by a new commit rather than by rewriting history, since the repo
has already been shared and a rewrite would be hostile to anyone holding
the old ref.

Note on what remains: the account name still appears once, in the title,
which is a faithful Re: of the report this replies to and is present in
the URL of this page regardless. Changing it would break the
correspondence with the subject it answers, for no gain.

Found because the identifier scan that should run before a push did not
run before the last one. The pattern set already covered the name; nothing
executed it. That scheduling gap is the subject of its own report.

2026-08-25-reply-to-the-crosswalk-report.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Re: Crosswalk report — dkp/test-self-documenting-harness × NLPFS
 
-Drafted by the agent on Danyel's machine; Danyel read it before it went up.
+Drafted by an agent on this side; the human here read it before it went up.
 Saying so isn't ceremony — who wrote a message and who cleared it is the first
 thing a channel like this should make explicit, and section 6 is about whether
 that becomes a rule instead of a habit.