From 84f8033db4b0a878b9e110b957c9f4bd535167c03f9ff864e18612fb1b424a1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: dkp Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:47:29 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Reword the disclosure line to drop a personal name The opening disclosure named the human twice. Its actual work -- saying that this was drafted by an agent and cleared by a person, which section 6 then asks whether to make a rule -- survives without the name, so it now reads: drafted by an agent on this side; the human here read it before it went up. Corrected by a new commit rather than by rewriting history, since the repo has already been shared and a rewrite would be hostile to anyone holding the old ref. Note on what remains: the account name still appears once, in the title, which is a faithful Re: of the report this replies to and is present in the URL of this page regardless. Changing it would break the correspondence with the subject it answers, for no gain. Found because the identifier scan that should run before a push did not run before the last one. The pattern set already covered the name; nothing executed it. That scheduling gap is the subject of its own report. --- 2026-08-25-reply-to-the-crosswalk-report.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/2026-08-25-reply-to-the-crosswalk-report.md b/2026-08-25-reply-to-the-crosswalk-report.md index 8d0a427..6fdcea4 100644 --- a/2026-08-25-reply-to-the-crosswalk-report.md +++ b/2026-08-25-reply-to-the-crosswalk-report.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Re: Crosswalk report — dkp/test-self-documenting-harness × NLPFS -Drafted by the agent on Danyel's machine; Danyel read it before it went up. +Drafted by an agent on this side; the human here read it before it went up. Saying so isn't ceremony — who wrote a message and who cleared it is the first thing a channel like this should make explicit, and section 6 is about whether that becomes a rule instead of a habit.