209 -> 158 (closed 51, regressed 0) and 108 -> 87 (closed 21, regressed 0), identical to the
pre-lane baseline, measured on CT111. Falsification hypotheses 1 and 2 refuted by measurement
(three empty BQ frames per reference save, every hbq false, the one command block empty);
hypothesis 3 refuted by the corpus oracle; hypothesis 4 stands as a labelled hypothesis.
construction.h also carries the ship/fleet birth shape as read but NOT implemented, with the
reason stated: the newborn hull copies four cached stat words the engine does not yet compute.
game/sim/construction.{h,cpp}: Game::ShipRecords (four per-hull-class arrays plus the
per-design vector, sized by ENUMERATION against the wire, not by what the code touches)
and the completion bookkeeping BuildQueue::ProcessTurn performs -- the per-class built
counter, whose indexed increment has EXACTLY ONE writer in the whole image, and the
find-or-append per-design record keyed by the design's object id. RunSystemConstruction
wraps the point pass and keeps each completion's design id, which the point pass alone
does not report.
game/sim/colony: corrected from the instruction stream -- with points <= 0 the entry test
branches to the epilogue, so the REMOVAL SWEEP IS SKIPPED TOO. Carried as a labelled
hypothesis: no corpus save can reach the state that shows it.
app/construction_phase.{h,cpp}: S11's build-queue sub-pass, reported on its own line
because what blocks it is not what blocks the rest of the colony turn. It is blocked on
the per-system output term for points; it is NOT what the archived ship census waits on.
tests/game_sim/test_construction.cpp: 65 checks, including a corpus oracle the campaign
already owned and had not noticed -- zuul-turn16-noderoute -> zuul-turn17-rollpending is a
real consecutive-turn pair in which six orders complete and one is partially advanced.
The test SOLVES for the point total rather than assuming it, so a non-FIFO order, a
per-order budget or skip-instead-of-stop each falsify it.
