flybrain/services/flysim/crates/fly-session/README.md
dev e27306f171 Merge main into feat/sf-publish-01
# Conflicts:
#	services/flysim/crates/fly-session/README.md
#	services/flysim/crates/fly-session/src/coordinator.rs
#	services/flysim/crates/fly-session/src/harness.rs
#	services/flysim/crates/fly-session/src/launcher.rs
2026-09-22 19:02:57 +00:00

376 lines
26 KiB
Markdown

# fly-session
The lockstep session coordinator, its phase machine and a synthetic composition over
[`flybus`](../flybus).
This crate is the SESSION-01 and SESSION-02 slices of the session-framework implementation
guide: the transaction of `step-v1`, driven over the Flybus router, with small fake workers
standing in for a brain and an emulator, run either in the coordinator's process, on dedicated
threads, or as one agent process per fly and one environment process under a launcher. It
contains no public controller API, no implicit best-effort retry, no real emulator and no real
brain.
The domain scalars, method payloads, their validation, the canonical digests and the trace
format all come from [`fly-session-types`](../fly-session-types), the CONTRACT-01 crate. This
crate adds only what is not part of the type contract: a session-side error value, the
synthetic composition's schema and event-id derivations, and the coordinator-local
`ControllerIntent`, `PortBinding` and `AgentOutcome` that never cross the bus.
```text
Ready(k) ─ Prepare all agents concurrently ────────────> every agent Prepared(k)
─ one executor per agent, sorted agent-id order
─ one complete port batch, descriptor port order
─ exactly one Environment.Advance(k, batch) ──> boundary k+1
─ task.evaluate_transition, once
─ Commit all agents concurrently ─────────────> every agent Ready(k+1)
─ committed boundary k+1, publish, next Prepare allowed
```
## Layout
| Module | Contents |
| --- | --- |
| `types` | A facade over the [`fly-session-types`](../fly-session-types) crate, plus the session-side additions a coordinator needs |
| `clock` | The `step-v1` section 5 rational tick accumulator and the coordinator's pacing |
| `phase` | The `step-v1` section 2 state machine as an explicit edge table |
| `dedup` | The `ipc-v1` section 5 operation keys, result caches and retention |
| `worker` | The worker dispatch shell: one service, the common `Worker.*` methods, admission |
| `agent` | A fake agent worker: seeded model, mutation counter, fixed readout stub |
| `environment` | The counter arena: one complete batch per advance, one native frame |
| `task` | The task and executor traits, the deterministic counter task, the identity executor |
| `rpc` | Domain calls: `req-<U64>` serials, incarnation pinning, the retry rule |
| `publish` | The publication boundary: declared delivery policies, named publication outcomes, the bounded event batch, the read-only repair service, an application channel and a fake multi-agent consumer |
| `coordinator` | The transaction, the trace, the failure rules and the publication boundary |
| `launcher` | The supervisor: thread budget, identities, start, health check, reap |
| `metrics` | Latency percentiles and the machine's core and memory counters |
| `measure` | The execution-mode comparison of the guide's section 5 |
| `cli` | The binary's subcommands: `agent`, `environment`, `measure` |
| `state` | The durable checkpoint store over `FLYSESS1`: compatibility, generations, the bounded writer |
| `harness` | The runnable composition: router, the flies, one arena, one coordinator |
## Execution modes and the launcher
A participant runs in one of three places, and the same composition code starts it in any of
them. The separate-process mode is the SESSION-02 subject; the other two are what it is
compared against.
| Mode | Where each participant runs | Transport |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `InProcess` | A task on the coordinator's runtime | in-memory or Unix socket |
| `Thread` | Its own OS thread, with its own runtime | Unix socket |
| `Process` | Its own process: one per fly, one for the world | Unix socket |
The launcher is the configured supervisor. It owns four things:
- **The thread budget.** A total allocation, one slice of it reserved for the coordinator and
its router, and one allocation per participant. A request the total cannot cover is refused
as `BUSY` before anything starts. `Agent.Initialize` carries exactly the allocation the
launcher handed out, and an agent refuses an Initialize asking for more than its own, which
is what `workers-v1` means by "within launcher allocation". The allocation is on the wire,
not only in the launcher's own record: `HelloResult.limits.workerThreads` reports it, under
the dated 2026-09-22 amendment to `workers-v1` section 2 that this slice added, so a
coordinator that is not also its own launcher can read the bound it has to respect.
- **Identity.** The bus client id, the service name, the worker id and an agent's port binding
are launcher configuration. The launcher says `Worker.Hello` with the identity it configured
and refuses anything that answers as another worker, role, incarnation or thread allocation
-- before the coordinator has pinned a registration. The registration the coordinator pins
is the one that hello returned, never one that was assumed.
- **Health.** `Worker.Status` on the supervisor's own monotonic clock, with the `ipc-v1`
section 6 prototype budgets: probe at two seconds, fail at ten, a separate budget for boot.
A status answer never waits for a mutation, so a busy participant is still a healthy one.
- **Reaping.** `Worker.Shutdown` is the request and the operating system is the guarantee. A
participant that does not stop inside the budget is terminated, and the supervisor reports
which of the two happened. A launcher that is dropped takes its children with it.
A separate-process participant is a subcommand of this crate's one binary, which is what
`implementation.md` section 2 allows instead of separate worker crates:
```sh
fly-session agent --socket S --store-root D --client-id C --service N --threads T ...
fly-session environment --socket S --store-root D --client-id C --service N --threads T ...
fly-session measure --steps 300 --agents 1,2,4
```
## What it implements
- **The transaction, in order.** Prepare all agents concurrently; run each task-local executor
once in sorted agent-id order; assemble all configured port controls in descriptor port
order; send exactly one `Environment.Advance`; evaluate the task once; commit all agents
concurrently. The committed boundary moves only when every commit has succeeded.
- **The state machine**, including `Paused` and `Failed`, with every transition recorded. A
transition the `step-v1` section 2 table does not list returns `INVALID_PHASE`.
- **The committed boundary rule.** Only `Ready(k)` or `Paused(k)` is a committed boundary; a
snapshot publishes one of those and never an in-progress mix of new agent state and an old
world.
- **Time and pacing** with checked rational accumulation. A 60 Hz world with a 1 ms model tick
produces 16, 17, 17 ticks over three steps, totalling 50, with a remainder of exactly zero.
Wall time is only pacing: when behind, the coordinator omits the sleep and reports the lag.
- **Initialization, pause and episodes.** The environment initializes first, while stopped;
the task bootstraps; then the agents warm up with learning disabled. Nothing in bootstrap
advances the world or produces a gameplay reward. A pause arriving mid-step completes the
transition and pauses at its committed boundary. A terminal task event commits its final
rewards, then the session pauses; no worker resets itself.
- **The failure rules.** A partial commit fails the epoch; an uncertain Advance is resolved
against its original domain request id and never becomes a second batch; a worker
incarnation change invalidates the epoch.
- **A failure stops the epoch rather than neutralising a player.** Every failure carries the
participant it is attributed to, and failing fences the session: the committed boundary
stops moving, the artifact handles are dropped, and no further transition or publication is
allowed. Lifting the fence is a coherent group restore, which is STATE-01's.
- **The `ipc-v1` section 6 procedure, on the path that reaches it.** A call that goes two
seconds without a terminal reply is *uncertain*, not failed. The coordinator then queries
the same operation -- a fresh bus call carrying the original domain request id and body,
pinned to the same incarnation, with its retained attachments -- absorbing `IN_PROGRESS`
while the original is still running. Only when that ends without a definite answer, or the
incarnation is gone, or the retained result expired, is the epoch failed. A merely slow
participant therefore finishes its step, and `step-v1` section 7's "query/retransmit same
request to same incarnation; never new batch" is the same code path for a slow Advance.
The procedure has two explicit bounds, and they do not mean the same thing. **`resolve`, 8
seconds, is the working limit**: two to notice plus eight to resolve is section 6's ten
seconds without progress. **`resolve_attempts`, 8192, is a guard**, not the limit -- the
procedure pauses 2 ms between attempts, so the guard is over sixteen seconds of pauses
alone, twice the budget, and an attempt whose call expires costs a whole probe on top. At
these values the budget is always what fires. Which one did is recorded in
`Coordinator::last_resolution` and named in the failure's own message, so an exhausted
resolution never has to be explained by arithmetic.
- **A bounded diagnosed outcome.** Those budgets are the coordinator's own, on its own clock,
so a participant that dies or stops answering produces a typed failure naming it rather than
a hang. An expired deadline is `unknown`, never `none`: a caller-side timeout is not
evidence that nothing was mutated.
- **Domain deduplication over bus calls.** Same key, request and body replays its cached
reply with fresh delivery ownership over retained artifacts; a changed body is `CONFLICT`; a
duplicate of a running operation is `IN_PROGRESS` for that bus call while the original
completes; an evicted record is `RESULT_EXPIRED`; a newly issued request naming an old step
is `STALE_STEP`. `Worker.Acknowledge` releases a domain result cache, which is not a bus
`delivery.consumed`.
## API
```rust
let harness = SessionHarness::start(Via::Unix, dir.path(), HarnessConfig::default()).await?;
harness.coordinator.bootstrap().await?; // Ready(0), world stopped at boundary 0
let reports = harness.coordinator.run(3).await?; // three transitions
harness.coordinator.pause_handle().request(); // finish this transition, then pause
harness.coordinator.trace.behavior(); // the step-v1 section 8 behaviour trace
harness.shutdown().await;
```
- `Coordinator::dispatch` selects `Sequential`, `Concurrent` or `Reversed` per-agent dispatch.
All three must produce the same behaviour trace; that is a test.
- `Coordinator::injections` asks for one deliberate message fault at one step: a duplicate
Prepare or Commit, an abandoned Advance result, an altered control batch, or a consumed
result artifact followed by a replay. `injection_log` reports what came back.
- `Coordinator::probe_raw` sends one domain request as it stands and returns the worker's own
terminal outcome, without letting the answer change session state.
- `AgentFaults` and `EnvironmentFaults` ask a worker for a deliberate delay or failure.
## The synthetic composition
- **Agents.** A fake model is an LCG with an explicit seed and one counter of everything that
mutated it: ticks, stimulations, reinforcements and input installs. The worker reports that
counter as its `progressCounter`, which is how a test proves a duplicate repeated nothing.
The readout is a fixed stub: it reads bits of the current state, masked by the declared
available actions, and never changes its own weights or invents a default winner.
- **Environment.** A signed counter. `inc` adds one, `dec` subtracts one, and one bipolar
`bias` axis is carried and validated but does not move the world. Each observation seals one
immutable 4x4 RGBA frame whose bytes carry the counter, so an agent reading its sensory view
reads the world rather than a constant.
- **Task.** Rewards are the counter delta of each agent's own port control, with deterministic
event ids derived from epoch, source step, rule and ordinal.
- **Executors.** The stateless identity executor only, as v1 specifies.
## Checkpoints and recovery
The durable store is `state`, over the `FLYSESS1` layout the contract crate owns.
- **One boundary, every participant.** `Coordinator::capture` runs at `Ready(k)` or
`Paused(k)` only. It takes its queue slot *before* the first `State.Capture`, so a saturated
writer refuses the capture rather than queueing it without bound, and the refusal is a
`BUSY` a stepping session survives rather than an epoch failure.
- **Capture and durability are two events.** `State.Capture` completes when an immutable
capture exists; `Coordinator::await_durable` completes when the store manifest rename has
happened, which is the durable commit point. Only the second moves the durable mark, and the
three ways it can end without one are told apart: `Failed` (the write stopped),
`ReplyLost` (the write finished and the acknowledgment did not arrive) and
`DeadlineExpired` (the caller's own budget ran out while the save was still going).
`Coordinator::resolve_durable` then asks the store about the *same* checkpoint instead of
saving again.
- **The writer is bounded twice**, and the two bounds refuse at different moments. The
outstanding-capture bound is taken before a capture is requested; the byte budget cannot be,
because a capture's size is not known until it exists, so it refuses at submit and releases
the payloads with the refusal. The writer owns its payload handles until the bytes are
committed or the job fails. A queued *replaceable* capture is superseded by a later one,
releasing its holds; a durable one never is.
- **The install is a group.** A restore selects a complete compatible generation, imports its
payloads as fresh artifacts, stages every participant, validates the coordinator's own
ledgers, and only then activates. A failure anywhere leaves the fence closed, and every
participant that got as far as staging is recorded as one that must be replaced before
another restore is attempted.
- **The fence lifts once.** `Failed -> Restoring(k) -> Paused(k)`, at the end of a complete
install and nowhere else. A fenced session takes no step, publishes nothing, captures
nothing and holds no artifact handle.
- **Nothing old crosses.** The fence drops every media handle; the restore imports fresh
artifacts; the environment re-renders its pending sensor pipeline from recorded
reconstruction inputs; and the new epoch's first audio chunk resumes the preserved sample
position and marks the discontinuity.
- **Epoch metadata in a trace.** `scope.epoch`, the batch id and every task event id are
derived from the epoch, so a resumed run's behaviour is compared through
`EpochRebase`, which rewrites exactly those and fails on anything it does not recognise.
## Where this crate narrows or adds to the contract crate
- **Required views.** `WorldObservation::validate_against` checks the views a result carries
against their descriptors. Requiring every *declared* view to be there at all is the
coordinator's Phase C check, so `verify_step_result` makes it: a missing required sensory
view fails the transition with `BUFFER_INVALID` rather than being replaced by an older frame.
- **`ControllerIntent`.** `workers-v1` section 4 calls the task and executor interfaces local
libraries, so their types live here rather than in the payload contract. An intent is a
`PortControl` without its port, and only the coordinator adds the port.
- **The phase machine.** `step-v1` section 2 is this crate's, not the contract crate's; the
trace's phase path is recorded beside the contract's `TransitionTrace`. The mid-step pause
it takes -- the transition finishes, then the session pauses at the boundary it just
committed -- is now written into the section 2 machine as a dated amendment.
## The publication boundary
`publishing-v1` on the same bus, with nothing added to the router:
| Address | Delivery | Contents |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `session.<id>.descriptor` | retained latest | `SessionDescriptor`, built from what each participant attested to |
| `session.<id>.snapshots` | retained latest | `CommittedSnapshot` plus the boundary's media handles |
| `session.<id>.events` | bounded, depth 64 | the transition's task events, with a `droppedBefore` count |
| `session.<id>.query` | RPC, read-only | `Session.GetDescriptor`, `Session.GetSnapshot` |
| `<app>.state`, `<app>.cues` | the application's own | whatever the experience needs, under the application's schema |
Every publication returns a named outcome: `Accepted`, `RefusedByObserver` or `Faulted`. Only
`BACKPRESSURE` is an observer's refusal, and a refusal takes no world step, stalls nothing and
fences no epoch -- it is counted per topic in the ledger and the exact value stays readable
through the query service. Anything else is the session's own fault and fails the epoch. A
snapshot is checked before it is published and again when it is read: every frame comes from
the boundary its declared delay implies, every handle is the artifact its reference names,
audio never goes backwards, and the snapshot agrees with the descriptor revision it names.
What is **not** here: the approved public v2 wire schemas and the stage adapters that speak
them. `implementation.md` sequences those after this slice and together with each other.
## Limitations
- **Fake workers.** There is no neural model and no emulator. What is modelled exactly is the
ordering, the identity rules and the retry rules, not any numerical behaviour.
- **One environment, one task.** A checkpoint records the composition it was taken from, and a
restore refuses one taken under another backend, content, patch, controller or parser
identity. It does not migrate between compositions, and it does not try.
- **No audience input.** The admitted pre-step stimulation list exists and is always empty.
- **One descriptor revision.** A revision changes when the composition does, and the only
in-session path to that is a group restore into a fresh epoch, which is STATE-01's. The
session publishes revision 1; the repair path, the revision cache and the index-change rule
are exercised against a second revision published by a `Publisher` of a second composition.
- **No per-subscriber eviction.** A bounded subscriber may refuse a publication, and Flybus v1
has no operation to drop that one subscriber, so the refusal costs every subscriber that
boundary's delivery on a stream whose contract is "latest". See the 2026-09-22 amendment to
`state-media-v1` section 3.
- **Pacing is coarse.** The pacing deadline rounds one step to whole nanoseconds for sleeping
only; simulation time stays rational and that rounding never re-enters the accumulator.
## Measurements
`fly-session measure` runs the same composition in each mode at one, two and four agents and
reports the thread allocation, the RPC and critical-path percentiles, the memory peaks and the
router's owner, collection and queue counters. **These are local synthetic timings on one
machine and no host capacity claim follows from any of them**; they exist so the three modes
can be compared with each other. Pacing is off for the run, so the samples are work rather
than sleep, and the run report carries the full table.
Every row runs in a child process of its own. A peak-memory figure is a high-water mark that
never falls, so rows sharing one process would each report where that process had already
been: the column would sort itself by row position rather than by mode, and the mode ranking
would reverse when the rows were reordered. One child per row is what makes the number belong
to the row.
What the numbers said on a four-core development box, at 300 transitions per row:
- A process boundary costs about a fifth of the critical path at the median. Two agents: 10.0
ms p50 in-process, 12.2 ms on threads, 12.1 ms across processes, with p99 at 21.4 / 19.4 /
21.4 ms. The dedicated-thread and separate-process variants are within noise of each other,
so what is being paid for is leaving the coordinator's runtime, not crossing a socket.
- `Worker.Status` -- an RPC answered from a cell with no domain work behind it -- is the
router and transport floor: 0.60 / 0.89 / 1.17 ms p50 for the three modes at two agents.
- Four agents needs six threads, which that box does not have, and every mode's tail widens
together. That is the budget being honest about oversubscription, not a property of the
process split.
- Memory is where the split really shows, but not where the first version of this note said.
The coordinator's own peak is roughly the same in all three modes and is *lowest* in process
mode -- 8.9 / 9.2 / 7.9 MiB at one agent -- because the workers are no longer inside it.
What the split costs is the children: about 5.7 MiB per participant process, so the whole
composition is roughly 9 MiB on threads against 39 MiB across processes at four agents.
- Ownership, collection and queues stayed bounded in every mode and at every agent count: at
most 15 live owners, 11 artifact roots and one queued entry per agent, with the store at
rest holding two sealed frames and 128 bytes. Of 311 frames observed, 309 were collected --
the two still owned are the current and previous boundary. The frame count is taken from the
behaviour trace's observation boundaries rather than calculated from the step count, so a
backend sealing two frames per boundary would show up instead of being hidden.
## Tests
```text
cargo test -p fly-session # unit + all three integration suites
cargo run -p fly-session --example session # the runnable synthetic session
cargo build -p fly-session --bin fly-session # the worker binary the launcher starts
cargo run -p fly-session --example processes # the same session in all three modes
```
The three integration suites do not all run over both transports, and cannot:
- `tests/session.rs` and `tests/failures.rs` are in-process compositions and run over both,
through the same router code. All but one test in them is generated twice by
`both_transports!`; `sequential_concurrent_and_reversed_orders_agree` walks both transports
inside one test, because it compares their behaviour traces against each other.
- `tests/processes.rs` runs over the Unix socket only, in all three execution modes. A
participant in a process of its own has no in-memory transport to reach the router by, so
the mode is the axis that suite varies and the transport is fixed.
- `tests/media.rs`, `tests/state.rs` and `tests/publishing.rs` run over both transports *and*
in the execution modes: each acceptance body is written once and registered twice, by
`both_transports!` in the in-process composition and by `all_modes!` over the socket.
`tests/publishing.rs` registers a subset that way rather than all of it, because the
publication boundary lives in the coordinator: unlike the render counter and the sensor log
it crosses no process boundary and stays fully observable in all three modes, which
`the_publication_boundary_holds_in_every_execution_mode` asserts rather than assumes.
- `tests/session.rs`: one world advance per complete batch; every agent Prepared before the
advance; one task evaluation per transition; every agent committed before the next Prepare or
any committed publication; the 16/17/17 tick profile with a zero remainder; a mid-step pause
completing its transition; bootstrap advancing nothing; the committed snapshot naming the
transition that just ended; a terminal episode pausing at its own boundary; `Worker.Status`
during a session; and sequential, concurrent and reversed dispatch producing one behaviour
trace.
- `tests/processes.rs`: the SESSION-02 acceptance bullets, each generated once per execution
mode -- a slow participant resolved rather than failed, a delayed one-agent result holding
the world, a worker or helper death with a
bounded diagnosed outcome, an uncertain Advance that creates no second batch, a partial
Commit that permits no next-step play, supervision and identity, and the launcher thread
allocation -- plus the sequential/reversed/parallel trace comparison across all three modes
and the two process-mode section 4 rows: a router restart during a world advance, and an old
worker's reply after a restart.
- `tests/publishing.rs`: the PUBLISH-01 acceptance bullets over both transports -- a consumer
that disconnects and one that stops consuming, a bounded observer's named refusal, every
boundary's media belonging to that boundary, a frame and a handle from another boundary
refused, an unheld revision repaired rather than inferred, a revision that was never
published, an index that moved under a mapped consumer, boundary 0's null decision, the
committed action being the transition that just ended, one snapshot carrying every agent,
application-owned state and cues, a held event batch, and the read-only query service --
plus the first two generated once per execution mode by `all_modes!`.
- `tests/state.rs`: the STATE-01 acceptance bullets -- an uninterrupted run and a resumed run
committing the same behaviour once the epoch metadata is rebased, a corrupt payload failing
the install as a group for every participant and for the coordinator's own ledger, a lost
save reply and an uncommitted store manifest both leaving the durable mark where it was, a
refused activation resuming no part of the world, the capture queue staying bounded under a
stalled writer, and old media and another parser's state failing to cross a recovery --
plus the once-only restore token, the superseded replaceable capture, and the fence that
lifts only through a complete restore.
- `tests/failures.rs`: a duplicate Prepare after a lost reply; a duplicate Commit; the same
batch with altered controls; a lost Advance result; a cached artifact consumed by its first
caller; one Commit failing after another succeeded; a replaced registration; a reply from
another incarnation; a world that advanced without sensory data; an exact duplicate of a
running operation; and an old-epoch operation.