SESSION-02: one agent process per fly and one environment process under the coordinator over the Unix-socket transport, compared against the in-process composition and a dedicated-thread variant. The mode is the only thing that changes; the composition, the coordinator, the workers and the router are the same code in all three. The launcher is the configured supervisor. It owns a total thread budget with one allocation per participant, refused as BUSY before anything starts when the total cannot cover it; the configured client, service, worker and port identities, proved in Worker.Hello before the coordinator pins a registration; Worker.Status health on the supervisor's own monotonic clock at the ipc-v1 section 6 budgets; and reaping, where Worker.Shutdown is the request and the operating system is the guarantee. The worker executable is a subcommand of this crate's one binary, which is what implementation.md section 2 allows in place of a separate worker crate. The coordinator's fault behaviour: every failure names the participant it is attributed to, every domain call has a caller-side deadline so a dead participant is a diagnosed outcome rather than a hang, and failing fences the epoch -- the boundary stops, the handles drop, and no further transition or publication is allowed. Agent.Initialize now carries the launcher's allocation, and an agent refuses one asking for more. tests/processes.rs proves every acceptance bullet once per execution mode, and the two section 4 rows SESSION-01 could not reach in one process: a router restart during a world advance, and an old worker's reply after a restart. measure compares the three modes at one, two and four agents; its table is in the crate README, and it is not a capacity claim.
16 KiB
fly-session
The lockstep session coordinator, its phase machine and a synthetic composition over
flybus.
This crate is the SESSION-01 and SESSION-02 slices of the session-framework implementation
guide: the transaction of step-v1, driven over the Flybus router, with small fake workers
standing in for a brain and an emulator, run either in the coordinator's process, on dedicated
threads, or as one agent process per fly and one environment process under a launcher. It
contains no public controller API, no implicit best-effort retry, no real emulator and no real
brain.
The domain scalars, method payloads, their validation, the canonical digests and the trace
format all come from fly-session-types, the CONTRACT-01 crate. This
crate adds only what is not part of the type contract: a session-side error value, the
synthetic composition's schema and event-id derivations, and the coordinator-local
ControllerIntent, PortBinding and AgentOutcome that never cross the bus.
Ready(k) ─ Prepare all agents concurrently ────────────> every agent Prepared(k)
─ one executor per agent, sorted agent-id order
─ one complete port batch, descriptor port order
─ exactly one Environment.Advance(k, batch) ──> boundary k+1
─ task.evaluate_transition, once
─ Commit all agents concurrently ─────────────> every agent Ready(k+1)
─ committed boundary k+1, publish, next Prepare allowed
Layout
| Module | Contents |
|---|---|
types |
A facade over the fly-session-types crate, plus the session-side additions a coordinator needs |
clock |
The step-v1 section 5 rational tick accumulator and the coordinator's pacing |
phase |
The step-v1 section 2 state machine as an explicit edge table |
dedup |
The ipc-v1 section 5 operation keys, result caches and retention |
worker |
The worker dispatch shell: one service, the common Worker.* methods, admission |
agent |
A fake agent worker: seeded model, mutation counter, fixed readout stub |
environment |
The counter arena: one complete batch per advance, one native frame |
task |
The task and executor traits, the deterministic counter task, the identity executor |
rpc |
Domain calls: req-<U64> serials, incarnation pinning, the retry rule |
coordinator |
The transaction, the trace, the failure rules and the publication boundary |
launcher |
The supervisor: thread budget, identities, start, health check, reap |
metrics |
Latency percentiles and the machine's core and memory counters |
measure |
The execution-mode comparison of the guide's section 5 |
cli |
The binary's subcommands: agent, environment, measure |
harness |
The runnable composition: router, the flies, one arena, one coordinator |
Execution modes and the launcher
A participant runs in one of three places, and the same composition code starts it in any of them. The separate-process mode is the SESSION-02 subject; the other two are what it is compared against.
| Mode | Where each participant runs | Transport |
|---|---|---|
InProcess |
A task on the coordinator's runtime | in-memory or Unix socket |
Thread |
Its own OS thread, with its own runtime | Unix socket |
Process |
Its own process: one per fly, one for the world | Unix socket |
The launcher is the configured supervisor. It owns four things:
- The thread budget. A total allocation, one slice of it reserved for the coordinator and
its router, and one allocation per participant. A request the total cannot cover is refused
as
BUSYbefore anything starts.Agent.Initializecarries exactly the allocation the launcher handed out, and an agent refuses an Initialize asking for more than its own, which is whatworkers-v1means by "within launcher allocation". - Identity. The bus client id, the service name, the worker id and an agent's port binding
are launcher configuration. The launcher says
Worker.Hellowith the identity it configured and refuses anything that answers as another worker, role or incarnation -- before the coordinator has pinned a registration. The registration the coordinator pins is the one that hello returned, never one that was assumed. - Health.
Worker.Statuson the supervisor's own monotonic clock, with theipc-v1section 6 prototype budgets: probe at two seconds, fail at ten, a separate budget for boot. A status answer never waits for a mutation, so a busy participant is still a healthy one. - Reaping.
Worker.Shutdownis the request and the operating system is the guarantee. A participant that does not stop inside the budget is terminated, and the supervisor reports which of the two happened. A launcher that is dropped takes its children with it.
A separate-process participant is a subcommand of this crate's one binary, which is what
implementation.md section 2 allows instead of separate worker crates:
fly-session agent --socket S --store-root D --client-id C --service N --threads T ...
fly-session environment --socket S --store-root D --client-id C --service N --threads T ...
fly-session measure --steps 300 --agents 1,2,4
What it implements
- The transaction, in order. Prepare all agents concurrently; run each task-local executor
once in sorted agent-id order; assemble all configured port controls in descriptor port
order; send exactly one
Environment.Advance; evaluate the task once; commit all agents concurrently. The committed boundary moves only when every commit has succeeded. - The state machine, including
PausedandFailed, with every transition recorded. A transition thestep-v1section 2 table does not list returnsINVALID_PHASE. - The committed boundary rule. Only
Ready(k)orPaused(k)is a committed boundary; a snapshot publishes one of those and never an in-progress mix of new agent state and an old world. - Time and pacing with checked rational accumulation. A 60 Hz world with a 1 ms model tick produces 16, 17, 17 ticks over three steps, totalling 50, with a remainder of exactly zero. Wall time is only pacing: when behind, the coordinator omits the sleep and reports the lag.
- Initialization, pause and episodes. The environment initializes first, while stopped; the task bootstraps; then the agents warm up with learning disabled. Nothing in bootstrap advances the world or produces a gameplay reward. A pause arriving mid-step completes the transition and pauses at its committed boundary. A terminal task event commits its final rewards, then the session pauses; no worker resets itself.
- The failure rules. A partial commit fails the epoch; an uncertain Advance is resolved against its original domain request id and never becomes a second batch; a worker incarnation change invalidates the epoch.
- A failure stops the epoch rather than neutralising a player. Every failure carries the participant it is attributed to, and failing fences the session: the committed boundary stops moving, the artifact handles are dropped, and no further transition or publication is allowed. Lifting the fence is a coherent group restore, which is STATE-01's.
- A bounded diagnosed outcome. A caller-side deadline on every domain call, on the
coordinator's own clock, so a participant that dies or stops answering produces a typed
failure naming it rather than a hang. An expired deadline is
unknown, nevernone: a caller-side timeout is not evidence that nothing was mutated. - Domain deduplication over bus calls. Same key, request and body replays its cached
reply with fresh delivery ownership over retained artifacts; a changed body is
CONFLICT; a duplicate of a running operation isIN_PROGRESSfor that bus call while the original completes; an evicted record isRESULT_EXPIRED; a newly issued request naming an old step isSTALE_STEP.Worker.Acknowledgereleases a domain result cache, which is not a busdelivery.consumed.
API
let harness = SessionHarness::start(Via::Unix, dir.path(), HarnessConfig::default()).await?;
harness.coordinator.bootstrap().await?; // Ready(0), world stopped at boundary 0
let reports = harness.coordinator.run(3).await?; // three transitions
harness.coordinator.pause_handle().request(); // finish this transition, then pause
harness.coordinator.trace.behavior(); // the step-v1 section 8 behaviour trace
harness.shutdown().await;
Coordinator::dispatchselectsSequential,ConcurrentorReversedper-agent dispatch. All three must produce the same behaviour trace; that is a test.Coordinator::injectionsasks for one deliberate message fault at one step: a duplicate Prepare or Commit, an abandoned Advance result, an altered control batch, or a consumed result artifact followed by a replay.injection_logreports what came back.Coordinator::probe_rawsends one domain request as it stands and returns the worker's own terminal outcome, without letting the answer change session state.AgentFaultsandEnvironmentFaultsask a worker for a deliberate delay or failure.
The synthetic composition
- Agents. A fake model is an LCG with an explicit seed and one counter of everything that
mutated it: ticks, stimulations, reinforcements and input installs. The worker reports that
counter as its
progressCounter, which is how a test proves a duplicate repeated nothing. The readout is a fixed stub: it reads bits of the current state, masked by the declared available actions, and never changes its own weights or invents a default winner. - Environment. A signed counter.
incadds one,decsubtracts one, and one bipolarbiasaxis is carried and validated but does not move the world. Each observation seals one immutable 4x4 RGBA frame whose bytes carry the counter, so an agent reading its sensory view reads the world rather than a constant. - Task. Rewards are the counter delta of each agent's own port control, with deterministic event ids derived from epoch, source step, rule and ordinal.
- Executors. The stateless identity executor only, as v1 specifies.
Where this crate narrows or adds to the contract crate
- Required views.
WorldObservation::validate_againstchecks the views a result carries against their descriptors. Requiring every declared view to be there at all is the coordinator's Phase C check, soverify_step_resultmakes it: a missing required sensory view fails the transition withBUFFER_INVALIDrather than being replaced by an older frame. ControllerIntent.workers-v1section 4 calls the task and executor interfaces local libraries, so their types live here rather than in the payload contract. An intent is aPortControlwithout its port, and only the coordinator adds the port.- The phase machine.
step-v1section 2 is this crate's, not the contract crate's; the trace's phase path is recorded beside the contract'sTransitionTrace. The mid-step pause it takes -- the transition finishes, then the session pauses at the boundary it just committed -- is now written into the section 2 machine as a dated amendment.
Limitations
- Fake workers. There is no neural model and no emulator. What is modelled exactly is the ordering, the identity rules and the retry rules, not any numerical behaviour.
- No state methods.
State.Capture,State.StageRestoreandState.ActivateRestoreare STATE-01. The phase machine has their edges (Capturing,Restoring) and the workers do not advertise them as implemented methods. - No audience input. The admitted pre-step stimulation list exists and is always empty.
- Pacing is coarse. The pacing deadline rounds one step to whole nanoseconds for sleeping only; simulation time stays rational and that rounding never re-enters the accumulator.
Measurements
fly-session measure runs the same composition in each mode at one, two and four agents and
reports the thread allocation, the RPC and critical-path percentiles, the memory peaks and the
router's owner, collection and queue counters. These are local synthetic timings on one
machine and no host capacity claim follows from any of them; they exist so the three modes
can be compared with each other. Pacing is off for the run, so the samples are work rather
than sleep, and the run report carries the full table.
What the numbers said on a four-core development box, at 300 transitions per row:
- A process boundary costs little at the median and shows up in the tail. Two agents: the critical path was about 7.8 ms p50 in-process, 8.6 ms on threads and 12.7 ms across processes, while p99 went 12.4 / 12.7 / 26.0 ms. The medians are within a small multiple of each other; the tails are where a scheduler with more runnable threads than cores appears.
- Four agents needs six threads, which that box does not have, and every mode's tail widens together. That is the budget being honest, not a property of the process split.
- Memory is the clearest difference: one coordinator at about 14 MiB peak RSS plus roughly 5.6 MiB per participant process, against a single 11 MiB process for the threaded variant.
- Ownership and queues stayed bounded in every mode and at every agent count: at most 15 live owners, 11 artifact roots and one queue entry per agent, with the store holding two sealed frames and 128 bytes at rest. Of 311 frames produced, 309 were collected -- the current and previous boundary are the two that are still owned.
Tests
cargo test -p fly-session # unit + all three integration suites
cargo run -p fly-session --example session # the runnable synthetic session
cargo build -p fly-session --bin fly-session # the worker binary the launcher starts
cargo run -p fly-session --example processes # the same session in all three modes
Every integration test runs over both transports, through the same router code: all but one
are generated twice by both_transports!, and
sequential_concurrent_and_reversed_orders_agree walks both transports inside one test
because it compares their behaviour traces against each other.
tests/session.rs: one world advance per complete batch; every agent Prepared before the advance; one task evaluation per transition; every agent committed before the next Prepare or any committed publication; the 16/17/17 tick profile with a zero remainder; a mid-step pause completing its transition; bootstrap advancing nothing; the committed snapshot naming the transition that just ended; a terminal episode pausing at its own boundary;Worker.Statusduring a session; and sequential, concurrent and reversed dispatch producing one behaviour trace.tests/processes.rs: the SESSION-02 acceptance bullets, each generated once per execution mode -- a delayed one-agent result holding the world, a worker or helper death with a bounded diagnosed outcome, an uncertain Advance that creates no second batch, a partial Commit that permits no next-step play, supervision and identity, and the launcher thread allocation -- plus the sequential/reversed/parallel trace comparison across all three modes and the two process-mode section 4 rows: a router restart during a world advance, and an old worker's reply after a restart.tests/failures.rs: a duplicate Prepare after a lost reply; a duplicate Commit; the same batch with altered controls; a lost Advance result; a cached artifact consumed by its first caller; one Commit failing after another succeeded; a replaced registration; a reply from another incarnation; a world that advanced without sensory data; an exact duplicate of a running operation; and an old-epoch operation.