Closes five of lane AI2's open items and corrects two published claims.
The stepping order: StrategyServer::ResumePlaying 0x007ddc90 walks the player
array in INDEX ORDER and raises SEResumePlaying at each live player; the app
callback StrategyApp::OnClientEvent 0x00838e10 delivers it inline for humans
and appends it, deduplicated, to the pending queue for AI players. So the AI
players are stepped in save player order, each at most once -- computable from
a save with no live measurement. AI2's search missed it because 0x00b29f98 is
not a pointer to the StrategyApp, it IS the StrategyApp: the enqueue writes the
absolute member address 0x00b29fb4 and never materialises the object base. The
enqueue also has zero direct callers and no vtable slot -- its address is stored
into StrategyServer+0x170 by CreateGame. Lane B6's third blind spot, twice over.
The two passes: `pass` is a tier index, not a plan/act switch. 0x006abb2a picks
between two per-candidate quota fields -- tier 0 takes +0x10, tier 1 takes +0x14
-- and the hub loops `for (i = 0; i <= pass; ++i)`. Every order-emitting exit is
gated pass == 1 (0x006bbd50, 0x006c16c0, 0x006cea50), so pass 0 claims each
task's minimum force in priority order and WRITES NOTHING. That halves the
ModCount arithmetic.
Corrections:
- AI2 §4.2: the nine "no order method" tasks are not planners. All nine emit
orders at depth 4-9; the depth-4 cut hid it. AITColonize reaches list 7 and
AITBuildPoliceShips reaches list 3, which is what their names promise.
- AI2 §3: the two priority overrides' flag polarity is inverted. The tunable
applies when bit 0 of +0x4 is SET, and "committed" is not a supported name.
- AI2 §10.6: the .data invade tunables have no loader. 650 and 750, image
constants, exactly one reader each and no writer anywhere.
Also: slot 12 named (a preemption permission, 0x006a8d20), slot 13's consumer
found (0x00696620, a range budget -- and the Zuul are exempt, a FOURTH
independent cross-check on AI2's species reading), slot 11's dispatch located.
ServerPlayer+0xf9/+0xfa -- the two bytes that decide whether a player is
AI-controlled -- sit in a hole in the serialised layout and are NOT in the save;
their writer is unfound and is the biggest remaining hole.
Static only; nothing here has run under an instrument. 160 indirect call sites
inside the AI closure are unresolved, so reachability is still a lower bound.
Four predictions with falsifiers in §7.
ghidra/addresses.d/lane-ai3.json: 15 entries, 1,105 -> 1,120, no duplicates,
validated to a scratch path.