Three lanes could not build this workload. VM144 built both halves from a cold main
menu on a stock, unmodified install -- no data file touched, no save edited -- and the
answer to the question they were built to ask is no.
TRADE. The premise everyone carried, that trade needs station construction plus its
tech, is wrong about the station: StrategyVars.txt makes a trade station a +2-routes,
+25%-income bonus, and NumTradeRoutesSupported has a floor of 1 per owned system, so
the population thresholds scale the count and do not gate it. The gate is one tech,
CCC_FTLEcon, and Zuul cannot research it at all. 20 routes and 6 trade sectors by
turn 4; 21 by turn 13.
SPY. Lane W3: "no lane has identified which UI produces a spy-program entry." It is
the fleet panel's Special menu, and the reason nobody found it is that the ship a spy
docks with is the Cruiser REPAIR AND SALVAGE mission section -- nothing in the UI
calls it a tender or mentions spies. Prediction S1 holds: the container grows at Build
Spy while the craft is still docked (tdep=-1, atto=<tender>), so no enemy colony and no
asteroid belt are on the critical path, which is what every earlier cost model assumed.
THE MEASUREMENT. With 21 routes, 6 sectors and 1 spy craft live, lane H's eleven entry
probes report the four outer tail callees entered exactly once per turn, as always, and
SpyManager::Slot13RngCallee, TradeManager::Slot13RngCalleeA and CalleeB entered ZERO
times -- this turn and across all seven instrumented turns, every probe installed=true.
The RNG ledger and the standalone's generator model do NOT need extending on account of
either container being non-empty. The next condition is active contents, not present
contents: tsnumflt=0 on every sector and spyon=0 on the spy.
WHAT ELSE FELL OUT. The trade-route vector is torn down and rebuilt every turn inside
ServerTradeManagerImpl::vslot9 (lane V2's phase-23 call 5 of 8, previously "draw-free"
and unexplained) -- an agreement, dropped rather than re-minted, as is the AI2 growth
helper. Two addresses are minted, both trapped live and both `mapped` not `verified`
because ReVa was unreachable: ShipAction_BuildSpy 0x00789620, a sibling of lane B6's
stack-built-fptr-table entry 0x120 bytes away, which is why no call-graph sweep ever
found this writer; and ServerSpyManager_CreateSpyCraft 0x008383c0.
And a correction with teeth: `spies2` is 0 in all 28 systems of a save that DOES have a
spy. The natural reading of lane W's count-0-in-11-saves was "no save has ever had one".
That reading is dead; spies2 is not the spy list, or it only fills for a deployed spy.
The research click path is written down for the first time (§4): clicking a tech node is
a PREVIEW, the bottom-left button confirms, Esc leaves without confirming, and the tree
pans only on a right-drag of about 600 px. That, not the tech cost, is what stopped
three lanes.
Saves: human-turn{5,8}-traderoutes, human-turn11-spytechs, human-turn15-spyprogram --
all --strict clean, 0 errors, 0 warnings.
The hypothesis under test was the lockstep discipline: that each run of an AI client consumes a
fixed number of draws regardless of the path it takes, so a reimplementation could keep the
generator aligned with the right COUNT and order of draws while getting the decisions wrong.
It is false, and it fails at four scopes. Measured with a new bracket on
StrategyClient::OnResumePlaying over the per-client generator at +0x134, six runs across VM140 and
VM145, five fresh processes; every unpinned run's autosaves are byte-identical to the published
oracle, so the instrument is behaviour-neutral (rules 19 and 26 both discharged).
across clients turn2->turn3: 3 / 0 / 0 words for AI players 32 / 496 / 512; human 0
across turns client 32: 3 words on turn 2, 7 on turn 1
across processes client 512 makes ONE cl_RandRange call on turn 1 -- the research-target
tie-break at 0x006a8495, phase 18 -- and it cost 1 word in one process and
3 in another, because RNG_NextInt is an unbounded rejection loop
per site RNG_Chance costs ZERO words at p<=0 and p>=1
Twenty-one live draw sites in an AI turn, in twelve functions (plus two provably dead ones); two
fired on the reference turn, three on turn 1. Only three are unconditional, and all three only
given that their enclosing function was called. Six of client 32's seven turn-1 words come from
the ship-design composer 0x006ad700, which is also where the only loop-carried draw lives.
Also: cl_RandFloat 0x00579c70, a third cl_* RNG facade, found twice independently. It reaches
RNG_NextFloat by a TAIL JUMP, so no rel32 sweep for the entry points can see it -- which is why
ai-turn-logic.md 5's 'zero NextFloat calls from the AI module' reads as true and is not. All 29
call sites of the three facades are inside the AI band: the cl_* RNG facade is AI-only surface.
Positives for the engine: the AI draws from nothing but its own client's generator (foreign_words
0 on every bracket), the human client draws nothing at all, and the per-turn cost is single digits.
Rung B is unaffected. Rung C needs the decisions.
C5b confirms C5a: pinning the AI client seeds to an earlier run's makes the creation
turn reproducible. Three processes, each drawing its own three seeds, all pinned to
C3's, all producing d59bb9f2... with identical gates (including player 512's target
282, the value no other run has produced) and identical element records.
The only word that differs anywhere across the three is word 3 of list 23's unnamed
Population body. Three runs with byte-identical autosaves cannot differ in a word the
applier reads, so that word is noise -- localised using the pinned pair as an
instrument, which is what a control on a k>1 workload is for.
Two agreeing is a 1/k coincidence; three is 1/k^2.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARBgSooAfokKUy6wKUKEyZ
Canonical pair turn2->turn3: the complete block set, the three heap payloads no
previous capture could read (route [272], list-10 [1728], the 24-byte Population
body), the three AI client seeds, and both output autosaves -- byte-identical to the
published oracle AND to this lane's own hooks=off control, so the stream and the save
come from the same run and the instrument did not change the turn it recorded.
Creation turn turn1->turn2: three runs. Pinning the AI client seeds to the values an
earlier run observed made a DIFFERENT process reproduce that run's block -- including
the research pick that varies -- and its autosave byte for byte. The workload three
lanes could not reproduce is reproducible given the seeds.
Two corrections to lane L4's list-23 reading (no trailing int; the body is not
turn-dependent) and one to my own list-5 record, the latter found by lane RB while
consuming this capture.
Format: JSON (raw words are ground truth, decoded is a typing) plus lane RB's own .tcb
grammar with the heap payloads filled in, so RB's reader consumes it unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARBgSooAfokKUy6wKUKEyZ
Two processes, same workload. Phase 18 tries three producers; only ONE of the
three AI players reaches the candidate walk at all, which is why the other two
are stable across every run of both lanes -- different code path, not better luck.
For that player the candidate stream is ONE entry, {2, 12}, in BOTH runs -- a
category, not a tech. So arrival order in the candidate vector is not the
mechanism (a vector of one has no order), and the three-arm fallback never ran
(both probes zero, both runs). The variation is inside the resolver that turns a
category into a tech, and it produced XNC_TrnsMorr2 (techId 288) in one process
and XNC_TrnsHum2 (techId 282) in the next.
k is nameable from the shipped tech data: XNC_ROOT allows six tier-1 techs at an
identical 2000 RP, one per species, each allowing exactly one tier-2 successor --
the six XNC_Trns<Species>2. Four of the six have been observed across six runs
between lanes L4 and L5, and their costs differ (13000-30000), so the resolver is
not ranking by cost; it takes whichever member of the available set it reaches
first.
Bonus rule-19 result: run R2's autosave is byte-identical to the hooks=off control
of the same workload. Twenty detours installed, same tiebreak, same bytes -- the
only free variable in the whole turn is the tiebreak itself.
Still open and flagged: BIO_GnMod, the one observed value outside that family.
Seven more addresses in ghidra/addresses.d/lane-l4.json; the eighth collided with
lane AI4's cl_SetResearchTarget and was dropped with the agreement recorded.
Two results from the same VM session, both of which needed a workload the
corpus cannot supply.
CDiff, played forward. ref-turn2 loaded and 49 End Turns driven through the UI
helper to frame 51, with the entry hook emitting one record per turn:
50 calls, frames 2..51, EXACTLY TWO STORES
frame 2 -1 -> 0
frame 50 0 -> 1 <- the modelled tier transition, at the modelled frame
and 47 turns between them on which the writer ran and wrote NOTHING
predict_path was computed at entry from the transcribed threshold table on all
fifty turns and agreed with the cdiff region on every one. Frame >= 100 is still
a code read and is not claimed as a measurement.
The AI seed probe (asked for by the coordinator, ranked above CDiff). Hooks on
Mars::RNG::Seed and StrategyApp::RunAI, two launches from turn1-state, load
only. Every AI client seed differs between processes -- net 32, 496 and 512 all
move -- while the record structure is identical and one Seed call with seed=0
produces a byte-identical state in both runs.
So the turn1-state -> turn2 nondeterminism is a SEED effect, not the ordering
effect predicted, and the 'one of three varies' observation is explained by two
of the three empires having a research pick that is robust to the stream. This
falsifies lane AI1's 'every draw from the static generator returns 0', which
that lane had explicitly flagged as arithmetic rather than measurement.
Where the seed comes from is NOT established; the finding names the one hook
that would settle it and the six values it must reproduce.
VM140 left as found: the 8-file save set with its oracle bytes intact.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARBgSooAfokKUy6wKUKEyZ
findings/subsystems/ai-order-capture.md -- two workloads on VM145, every submitted
TurnCommands block dumped at the batch applier, plus sixteen pass-attributed entry
probes on the task bodies and the emission gates.
Headline: our emission model reproduces both real blocks exactly, list for list and
element for element, and both turns land on the measured ModCount of 12. What it did
not have: a list-23 element on every AI turn (the first element ever observed in the
free half of the cost table, and it really is free), client-allocated ids travelling
inside the commands (design 18, fleet 34 -- neither in the input save), and build,
rates and population all naming the same home system.
Two predictions falsified, both usefully: the batch is n = playerCount = 8 with the
four monster factions holding untouched slots, not n = 4; and the fleet order names
the fleet the client has ALREADY created, not the one in the save.
AITRaid's pass-0 question stays open and now says why -- the task never ran on either
board, so the list-16 zero is 'never entered', not 'entered and silent'.
Rule 19: the ref-turn2 control passed byte-identical to the published oracle with all
seventeen detours installed. Separately, the turn-1 workload is NOT reproducible --
three runs, three autosaves, differing in exactly one field: the research target of
the AI player that owns nothing.
ghidra/addresses.d/lane-l4.json: 9 entries (8 IAITask::Execute bodies + the list-16
order method). Raw logs and the two divergent autosaves in verify/results/shim/aiorders/.
TShn is refreshed to Frame for every (system, player) that satisfies ServerSystem::IsKnownTo
0x00746390 -- IsVisibleTo OR (2-bit sensor contact at ServerSystem+0x24 AND CCC_AdvSens). Not
AFlags alone, which is why lane E3 could not fit it. The writer chain was confirmed live, frame by
frame, from a hardware watchpoint on Spica's NVO node; the refresh runs twice per End Turn (driver
phase 24 and combat-done phase 25).
Also: the trade and spy containers read out of a live game for the first time (both empty, zero
traps -- the workload confirmation two lanes lacked); Player.Status's predicate named as
ReqCL != 0 && Elim == 0, with Species != 4 shown to be a corpus coincidence; and all ten command
ModCount handlers named, two of them only reachable on a turn-1 workload.
Corrects objects/layouts.md's ServerSystem PID@0x274 row and closes system-visibility-record.md 7.
Runs: build w3tshn-bb81d3d-20260908T2007Z, configs shim.cfg.w3tshn / w3mod / w3control.
Rule 19 control passed -- the armed run reproduced the determinism oracle byte for byte.
Multiplayer: two clients on one guest, joined by typed IP and by LAN browse, launched a
2-player game and played two turns in lockstep. 44,319 packets captured outside the guest,
ZERO to any GameSpy port. Availability check fails open exactly as lane G2 read it; Join
Manually is enabled with every gamespy.com name dead, falsifying G2's own caveat (a). The
shipped MOTD is fetched live from kerberos-productions.com and tells players to host in LAN
mode -- the developer's own statement of the same finding.
Watchpoints: a new shim module arms DR0-DR3 from StrategyServer::ApplyAllTurnCommands.
ModCount takes exactly 12 writes per End Turn (lane A2's prediction, confirmed twice, both
predicted addresses exact); Frame takes exactly one, from BeginProcessTurn+0x2a, settling the
ModCount-vs-Frame naming in A2's favour. The Player.Status writer between tail phase 31 and
the autosave EXISTS and is StrategyNetworkClient::OnMessage+0xa15 -- correcting lane T2.
Rule 19 control: the armed run reproduced the determinism oracle byte for byte.
rcex: closed from the corpus alone. It is sixteen 4-bit per-player counters; nibble p is set
to 1 on the turn the system enters player p's AFlags and ticked to 0 the next turn. 7/7
across two different games.
- determinism oracle regenerated and byte-identical (bb4fd9ac / 978041ac)
- the four phase-23/33 draw-bearing tail callees run EVERY turn; the three inner
functions holding the draws run zero times -- the gate is inside each outer body
- CreateRaidEncounter is called (2 on one turn) and draws nothing: candidate list empty
- Zuul: 7 calls / 7 words per trade-raid Chance site, 14 not 16, as predicted
- EncounterDetect_Run receives an EMPTY record vector, so ProcessTeamRecord and
AssignContacts never run; the 2-word detection residual is in 0x007d5150's subtree
- a MinHook detour on 0x00893290 changes the game's output; bisected over six runs.
The un-instrumented game and lane Z's instrument agree, so lane Z's numbers stand
- lane AI1 insert: P2 held across two fresh processes, Rung B stays as written
We consume 18-22 generator words per turn and model none of them as a count.
All of it is inside StrategyServer::ProcessTurn; OnAllCombatDone_Tail costs 0
on every turn observed; the residual outside the two drivers is exactly 0. The
generator does not move between turns at all, so the interval a standalone has
to reproduce is closed at both ends.
The instrument reads generator STATE, not calls, and that choice paid: the
image has four draw entry points, not three (NextUInt 0x004f7670 is in no
lane's primitive set) plus inlined draws in twelve functions, two reachable
from the turn roots. A primitive-counting hook would have undercounted
silently.
Checked against the save files independently: the turn-6 autosave pair gives
18 words read from the two Sim.RNG blobs, and with twists == 0 that number
never passes through a twist implementation -- so the two instruments do not
share the hidden assumption they could have.
Corrections to combat-done-tail.md, in place:
* the node-line 0x20000-fleet check runs AFTER the Chance(0.5f) call and
cannot gate the draw; the expiry test is NodePath::RemainingLife 0x006e2130
and is now a formula rather than a description
* StrategyHost::Autosave is ret 8 and returns the std::string* in EAX
* SNMAllCombatDone IS delivered every End Turn (8 of 8) -- lane K's inference
was right; the stronger no-encounter reading is narrowed, not closed
* S+0x8 advances 12-14 times per turn, not twice
Node-line decay still has not fired. The hook reports the distance instead of
the absence: 51 of 53 lines are permanent, the mortal ones are dug ~1/turn by
the Zuul, each ~40 turns from expiry. It stays a labelled hypothesis.
Reads: TechTree::PrereqsMet 0x0057d8e0 (AND of ORs; zero groups TRUE, an empty
group FALSE), the prerequisite layout at TechDef+0x88/+0x98, the tail collector
0x00587cc3, and the head of OnTechResearched (RecordObservedTech unconditional;
the research-event roll gated on ResT == def && ResearchRollPending).
Live: 35 compared calls over three workloads, 0 divergences, tracecmp exit 0,
End-Turn oracle hashes unchanged. The EVENT_TECHS_UNLOCKED residual lane P
predicted and lane V measured is closed by running the cascade, not by posting
on completion.
12 new addresses in ghidra/addresses.d/lane-u.json (header 615 -> 627).
Lane P wrote the expected numbers into sots-engine docs/P-events-wiring.md §4 before
this run existed. Every one held.
First End Turn (ref-turn2 -> Launch -> End Turn, shim.cfg.recapb3 unchanged, build
eventlive-dd38117-20260908T0916Z, main dd38117 with no source change): 3 calls, 3
compared, 0 divergent, tracecmp exit 0 — where lane R's run exited 1 on
side.events.after.v.next_id orig=4 ours=3. Call 0 read turn=3,
events_turn_bucket_exists=true, events_next_id_in=3, events_in_turn_bucket=1,
events_dedup_risk=0, no events_scan_truncated, next_id 3->4 on both sides,
turns/turns_bytes 2/48 unchanged, node[144].progress 2879->5768, flag 1->2, rng
identical — the whole predicted list.
Five End Turns: exit 1 with 2 divergent calls instead of 3, each short by exactly 1
(next_id orig 7 ours 6, orig 12 ours 11) = the deliberately unmodelled
EVENT_TECHS_UNLOCKED. A 0-divergence result there would have been suspicious.
sizeof(Game::ObservedTech) = 44 measured live: observed_techs.bytes grew by exactly
44 on both completion calls (440->484, 484->528), confirming lane X's static pin
behaviourally. Non-researching players measured 880 = 20 x 44 and never moved.
One deviation from lane R, and it is a workload effect, not a defect: rng diverged on
call 9 because the completed tech had research_roll_pending set and the
OnTechResearched callback drew one word ours does not (left 374 vs 375). Lane R's
"RNG matched 15 of 15" was workload luck; the honest statement is that the rng region
matches on every call that does not complete a roll-triggering tech.
Zuul double roll CLOSED. No species-5 save existed, so this lane made one: a custom
game with only Zuul in the Available Species pool, 4 End Turns under the same compare
config. 8 calls, 8 compared, 0 divergent, exit 0; all four researching calls have
species=5 and advance the generator by two, not one (left 540->538, 522->520,
504->502, 485->483), and ours reproduced every post-state bit-for-bit. Save added as
verify/results/saves/zuul-turn5-species5.sav.
End-Turn oracle byte-identical to lane R's on the first turn, so none of this
perturbs the game. clean_room_check OK and host ctest 33/33, run as separate commands.
VM140 restored to the recap build at the main menu and released.
Five hooks recaptured, build recap-7584bad-20260908T0615Z, no source change.
- ProcessResearch: the over-budget event is now a compare divergence
(side.events.after.v.next_id orig=4 ours=3) instead of a 609 KB save diff.
15 calls over 5 turns, 3 diverged, RNG matched 15/15.
- ComputeBudget: 4284 compared, 0 diverged, guard quiet - but only 20 distinct
states and 13 of 22 slots always zero.
- MoveFleet: 8 of 45 calls diverge by 1 ULP of position. B4's clean verdict was
a one-sample verdict.
- First guarded captures for OnTechResearched (RollResearchEvent draw fired and
matched), the colony turn and MoveFleet.
- Guards mapped SetResearched live and found an undeclared ObservedTech append.
VM140 released at the main menu, hooks=trace.
