C5b confirms C5a: pinning the AI client seeds to an earlier run's makes the creation
turn reproducible. Three processes, each drawing its own three seeds, all pinned to
C3's, all producing d59bb9f2... with identical gates (including player 512's target
282, the value no other run has produced) and identical element records.
The only word that differs anywhere across the three is word 3 of list 23's unnamed
Population body. Three runs with byte-identical autosaves cannot differ in a word the
applier reads, so that word is noise -- localised using the pinned pair as an
instrument, which is what a control on a k>1 workload is for.
Two agreeing is a 1/k coincidence; three is 1/k^2.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARBgSooAfokKUy6wKUKEyZ
Canonical pair turn2->turn3: the complete block set, the three heap payloads no
previous capture could read (route [272], list-10 [1728], the 24-byte Population
body), the three AI client seeds, and both output autosaves -- byte-identical to the
published oracle AND to this lane's own hooks=off control, so the stream and the save
come from the same run and the instrument did not change the turn it recorded.
Creation turn turn1->turn2: three runs. Pinning the AI client seeds to the values an
earlier run observed made a DIFFERENT process reproduce that run's block -- including
the research pick that varies -- and its autosave byte for byte. The workload three
lanes could not reproduce is reproducible given the seeds.
Two corrections to lane L4's list-23 reading (no trailing int; the body is not
turn-dependent) and one to my own list-5 record, the latter found by lane RB while
consuming this capture.
Format: JSON (raw words are ground truth, decoded is a typing) plus lane RB's own .tcb
grammar with the heap payloads filled in, so RB's reader consumes it unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARBgSooAfokKUy6wKUKEyZ
Two processes, same workload. Phase 18 tries three producers; only ONE of the
three AI players reaches the candidate walk at all, which is why the other two
are stable across every run of both lanes -- different code path, not better luck.
For that player the candidate stream is ONE entry, {2, 12}, in BOTH runs -- a
category, not a tech. So arrival order in the candidate vector is not the
mechanism (a vector of one has no order), and the three-arm fallback never ran
(both probes zero, both runs). The variation is inside the resolver that turns a
category into a tech, and it produced XNC_TrnsMorr2 (techId 288) in one process
and XNC_TrnsHum2 (techId 282) in the next.
k is nameable from the shipped tech data: XNC_ROOT allows six tier-1 techs at an
identical 2000 RP, one per species, each allowing exactly one tier-2 successor --
the six XNC_Trns<Species>2. Four of the six have been observed across six runs
between lanes L4 and L5, and their costs differ (13000-30000), so the resolver is
not ranking by cost; it takes whichever member of the available set it reaches
first.
Bonus rule-19 result: run R2's autosave is byte-identical to the hooks=off control
of the same workload. Twenty detours installed, same tiebreak, same bytes -- the
only free variable in the whole turn is the tiebreak itself.
Still open and flagged: BIO_GnMod, the one observed value outside that family.
Seven more addresses in ghidra/addresses.d/lane-l4.json; the eighth collided with
lane AI4's cl_SetResearchTarget and was dropped with the agreement recorded.
findings/subsystems/ai-order-capture.md -- two workloads on VM145, every submitted
TurnCommands block dumped at the batch applier, plus sixteen pass-attributed entry
probes on the task bodies and the emission gates.
Headline: our emission model reproduces both real blocks exactly, list for list and
element for element, and both turns land on the measured ModCount of 12. What it did
not have: a list-23 element on every AI turn (the first element ever observed in the
free half of the cost table, and it really is free), client-allocated ids travelling
inside the commands (design 18, fleet 34 -- neither in the input save), and build,
rates and population all naming the same home system.
Two predictions falsified, both usefully: the batch is n = playerCount = 8 with the
four monster factions holding untouched slots, not n = 4; and the fleet order names
the fleet the client has ALREADY created, not the one in the save.
AITRaid's pass-0 question stays open and now says why -- the task never ran on either
board, so the list-16 zero is 'never entered', not 'entered and silent'.
Rule 19: the ref-turn2 control passed byte-identical to the published oracle with all
seventeen detours installed. Separately, the turn-1 workload is NOT reproducible --
three runs, three autosaves, differing in exactly one field: the research target of
the AI player that owns nothing.
ghidra/addresses.d/lane-l4.json: 9 entries (8 IAITask::Execute bodies + the list-16
order method). Raw logs and the two divergent autosaves in verify/results/shim/aiorders/.
