NVE is a per-(system, player) map of {ETS = turn of sighting, Eid = encounter type
present}. Primary writer 0x00756300, called from tail phase 17 under the gate
(AFlags >> PlyrIdx) & 1 -- byte-decoded at 0x007cf7a7..0x007cf7ce, not from the
decompiler. Three further accessors named, including the intel-sharing copy that
keeps the older sighting stamp. operator[] has exactly three callers and none of
them erases, so the record is a memory, not a state.
Also names ltis's writer (driver phase 29, AFlags != 0 -> ltis = Frame), closing
half of board.md's 'TShn/ltis: NOTHING NAMES THEIR WRITER'. TShn's own gate is
still unnamed and demonstrably NOT AFlags -- Spica is the counterexample.
Resolves lane B5's flagged indirect edge: SetExploredBy's vft[0x1c] is
ServerSystem vtable slot 7 at 0x007480b0, and it writes only an unserialised
runtime mask.
Prediction committed before the engine change exists: 204 -> 158 (46 closed, 32
of them the brief's target) and 103 -> 87 (16 closed), 0 regressed, with a
falsification section naming the corpus save that separates AFlags from VFlags.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARBgSooAfokKUy6wKUKEyZ
standalone_report.py regenerated from sots-engine wip/turnrecord. The reference pair does
not move by design: T36 does not commit by default, so 209 -> 204, closed 5 / regressed 0
and 108 -> 103, closed 5 / regressed 0 are unchanged. What moved in section 6 is the phase
tally, 14/44 modelled and 8 committed -> 15/44 and 9, from the A2 and D2 merges. verified
stays 0 on both tables.
t36-turnrecord.md carries the measurement the default run cannot show: with
--commit-blocked=T36 and a data root, the reference pair closes 29 leaves and regresses 7
(was 9). Two of the three census leaves close; the third is short by exactly one destroyer
on both pairs, because no phase we run builds a ship. The census model itself reproduces
480/480 archived census leaves over 11 saves with 0 mismatches.
T36 stays blocked: sav and inc on lane E1's budget, and one ship count on unmodelled
construction. A field-granular commit knob is not implementable -- the archived record is
one struct on the wire and has no hole to leave.
Coverage: 32 of 480 census leaves are nonzero anywhere in the corpus; cls1 and cls2's
platform count are unexercised, not verified.
Blocker #4 on lane Y's path to a byte-matching turn.
HOW DESIGNS PERSIST, correcting a published finding. Game::ShipDesign::Write is
0x008325e0 and makes four stream calls. The recorded address 0x008747a0 is in
NO vftable at all (lane V2's inversion), so "ShipDesign::Write makes no stream
call" was a misattribution, not a fact about the class. Game::ShipDesign
derives from Game::ShipDesignDef and inherits IStreamable second, so its writer
is reached through an adjustor thunk -- which is what the slot-indexed
serializer sweep found instead. A design persists as two serializers, base and
derived: ShipDesignDef::Write 0x00827390 emits FAIDes/DHide/DWep/DName then
exactly three DSec frames (+0x4c command, +0x24 mission, +0x74 engine),
ShipDesign::Write appends Dtc, the Dwgv flag and a conditional Dwg frame.
THREE sections, not five. The campaign's "slots 3-4 reserved and always empty"
was save_reader.py's trailing Rest("sections") sweeping Dtc and Dwgv into the
section list, and stock_designs.py decoding them as two empty sections -- rule 8
in its exact form, reader and consumer agreeing with each other and both wrong.
Two independent enumerations say three: the writer's straight-line body, and the
ctor's eh_vector_constructor_iterator(this+0x24, 0x28, 3) closing at
0x9c = sizeof(ShipDesignDef).
DWep and Dwgv are BOOLs, not ints -- byte-indistinguishable from ints at a
four-character tag, the same class of defect as ObservedTech.odet.
THE 0x400 FLAG IS `defence_platform`, read off the .shipsection parser's own bit
setter at 0x005749b7. NOT lane B5's 0x400: that one is a fleet flag, on the wire
as FtFlg. The full role-flag table is in the finding. HULL SIZE is section_class
through a three-name stricmp table (Destroyer/Cruiser/Dreadnought -> 0/1/2),
absent or unrecognised meaning 0 with a log line rather than an error. Both
words are recomputed from the data files by ShipDesign::UpdateDerivedStats
0x0087e7c0 and neither is on the wire. Corroborated by the default hull-health
table the same bit picks: 500/3000/15000 without it, 100/500/1000 with.
MEASURED: the census rebuilt from each save's own state matches the record the
game archived, 480 leaves / 0 mismatched over 11 saves and 503 designs, computed
independently in Python and in C++. COVERAGE REPORTED AS LOUDLY: only 32 of the
480 leaves are nonzero, and three of the six census leaves (both cruiser rows,
dreadnought platforms) are unexercised by every save in the corpus.
Closed 0 / regressed 0 against the standalone's divergence list, reported
separately: the census leaves live in src/app's turn record, which lane A2 holds
this cycle, so this lane evaluated and reported rather than writing.
Oracles fixed openly (rule 12): save_reader.py's Des shape, 49/49 with three
corrected tests and one added that pins "exactly three DSec" against real saves;
stock_designs.json regenerated, whose diff is only raw_slots 5->3 and dWep
int->bool across all 127 designs with every other field identical;
test_design_rules.py still 32/32 with the same ground truth.
19 addresses in ghidra/addresses.d/lane-d2.json, no collision; the generated
header was validated to a scratch path, never written in place.
Spine phase 4, byte for byte at 0x007dc871-0x007dc8c7. Three separate stores to
the same word -- clear, OR the self bit, then conditionally OR the alliance
mask -- which is what makes the alliance term an OR and is invisible in any
summary of the phase. The bit is the player's POSITION IN THE VECTOR.
Checked against the almem bytes the game archived: 72 of 80 player-records
agree, and the other 8 are predicted by the same model (FinalizeTurnRecords also
runs on load, and the load path does not run the spine, so every save's earliest
archived turn carries a zero mask -- true on all 11).
Reported as loudly: the corpus cannot separate `1 << vectorIndex` from
`1 << PlyrIdx` (0 of 80 records differ), cannot separate the OR from a plain
assignment (every observed alliance mask already contains its member's own bit),
and cannot separate the ALid guard from an AL != 0 guard. Those three are
instruction-stream readings only.
ModCount, named and enumerated. StrategyServer::Write tags both words itself, so
S+0x8 is the wire's ModCount and S+0xc is Frame -- addresses.json has the name
on the wrong word, and turn-driver.md's "they stay in lockstep" is corrected in
place. RTTI gives the reason for the two bases: Game::StrategySim is a base
sub-object at offset 4.
29 writer sites: 20 command handlers plus 6 inlined in the command-batch applier
(each an unconditional bump on ENTRY, before validation), the two turn drivers,
and the abandon/chaos check -- which is gated on Abdn, false on all 28 systems
of all 11 saves. So the per-turn delta is 2 + one per command applied out of
every player's TurnCommands block; the 0x1b4 container stride independently
confirms lane Q's block layout. It is not derivable from the pre-turn save.
The residual is a watchpoint, specified with its own written prediction (exactly
12 hits on turn1-state) and four falsifiers. Direct-call reachability is stated
as the lower bound it is, per lane V2's indirect-edge measurement.
Engine side: sots-engine wip/alliance 5e409cf.
FUN_007066c0 is not a path finder. It performs no graph search: it walks the caller's
already-chosen destination list and classifies each consecutive pair through
FUN_00703730, accumulating flags and the index of the first failing leg. The only graph
structure in the subtree is a single-hop adjacency query. A multi-hop node route in a save
is n waypoints, one per hop.
OrderFleetMove's three failure bits, from the 0x418 literal: 0x008 the destination fleet
is on a node route and no intercept could be solved, 0x010 a ship's drive is destroyed,
0x400 the destination point is not one the player may use. The other nine bits are
advisory or route-quality complaints the server commits anyway -- the UI's dry run tests
the whole word, which is what separates the two groups.
Waypoint type 2 is the Liir drive, not a node line. The species-to-drive jump table maps
Human and Zuul (the two node races) to 3 and Liir to 2, so lane O's 20+ all-type-3
observations were forced by the table. Nothing is unreachable and nothing needs fixing;
exercising type 2 needs a Liir fleet, not a node line.
Also: GFlags(+0xdc) is the per-player gate mask; CstR is the gate-projection radius and
type 5 is a gate throw at a gateless system, not the Zuul bore; pnd is the node transit's
origin id; FtTrans is a second saved copy of the first waypoint's type. Two original
defects recorded as shipped (a loop-invariant drive comparison, a loop-invariant node-line
ranking term) and one predicted (the leading-destination drop shifting the output arrays).
P1/P2/P5 written before the run and checked offline against all 11 saves: 58 waypoints,
46 flight plans, 0 failures. 37 addresses filed; merge generates 912, validated to a
scratch path.
findings/subsystems/output-term.md is the whole reading: the call chain with
real function boundaries, the formula, the closed list of nine values the data
files supply (down from an unbounded fear), the advance prediction with its
falsification table, and the live result.
Corrects strategic-turn-internals.md 3.3 in place. That block had the SHAPE
wrong, not just the detail: a system's output is a sum of three terms, and the
function it named as the population base-output term is the over-harvest
resource demand.
Live on VM140, two builds, two species, both hooks in compare mode:
GroupOutput 13,105 calls / 0 divergences, ComputeTotalOutput 11,252 / 1 (one
ulp), 0 undeclared writes in 24,357 guarded calls. Thirteen distinct system
states, and every unexercised branch is listed rather than counted as covered.
tools/max_income_predict.py is the other half: it computes lane Y's
bankruptcy-limit oracle from colony state and reports 6 of 25 player-records
matching exactly, with the misses all AI-owned and the single-system ones short
by exactly the 1.1 difficulty income multiplier.
Every call-graph result in this repo was computed over direct (E8) edges.
5,045 of the 5,207 functions named by a vftable slot have zero direct call
sites, so all of those results were lower bounds. Lane Z's dominant RNG
consumer hung off exactly such an edge.
tools/vtable_map.py builds, from the RTTI walk plus a full sweep to the next
function start (rule 17):
* vftable -> class -> sub-object offset -> slot -> target, and its inverse
* the class hierarchy from the RTTI base lists, so an abstract interface
with one concrete override resolves uniquely
* constructor-derived member typing (ctor result -> [this+d])
* the slot index at every indirect call site, with a backward register
resolver that refuses to cross a branch target rather than guess
* `this`-carrier spans and this/member call-graph propagation of class
Validation (12/12): rediscovers ServerTradeManagerImpl slot 10 ->
GenerateTradeRaidEncounters from the dispatch at 0x007d8469 with nothing
hand-fed, and re-derives the *Impl rule for both managers. Receiver-class
pinning reaches only 2.5% of the 6,398 virtual sites, at 0.6% out-of-range
against a 70% chance baseline; the displacement-only route measured worse
than random (81% vs 58%) and is rejected outright.
Closes lane K's tier-4 blind spot: all nine phase-23 calls and both phase-33
calls named. Four of the eleven reach a draw on the strategic generator
(StrategyServer+0x16c) at eight instruction-verified sites, none ever
observed firing — so "the tail draws nothing" is a property of eight turns,
not of the code. Also resolves the nine parked inlined-draw functions to
their vtable roots (correcting how that was recorded: none is itself in a
vftable; their topmost ancestors are), and finds 14,958 inter-function tail
jump edges without which three of them look like dead code.
saved-state writer under combat
FUN_007d5a00's six callees, read from the instruction stream to the next
function start, plus 18 helpers. Lane J named this "the real per-phase combat
pipeline"; the identification of it as the most tractable target was right and
the characterisation was not. It is one subsystem -- destinations, group,
classify, split, execute, destroy -- and it is StarFleet retreat.
Seven saved fields or containers move on this path: ship->fleet membership,
StarFleet objects created and destroyed in the master list, the system fleet
lists, fleet position/location/flight plan/flags, the ServerSystem presence and
explored masks, the per-player PlayerView, and ServerPlayer.GTraf.
Closes struct-recovery.md section 7's open "OID allocation (R2's x16)": the
allocator is at 0x008b8ae0, the counter lives per network node at
IDMap->+0x08 + node*0x14 + 0x10, it is pre-incremented and never issues 0, and
an id is (counter << 4) | (node & 0xF). R2's x16 is the shl 4. A partial
retreat mints one id per group, and that counter is almost certainly the save's
NMnx tag -- labelled hypothesis, with a falsifiable prediction written down
before any run.
New rule: retreating from a system you had not explored marks it explored for
you, writing EFlags and refreshing the PlayerView. New diplomacy rule: a system
whose owner captured it on the current turn loses that owner's ceasefire cover
in the hostile-presence test.
RNG recomputed independently from a different root and with a different tool:
327 functions in the closure once E9 tail-call thunks are followed (the first
pass missed an 8-byte jmp thunk and with it the whole id-allocator chain), zero
calls to the four primitives, zero inlined MT tempering immediates, and one
false-positive 0x11c stride that is StarFleet.FtMS being initialised to -1.
Bound, not proof: 152 indirect call sites in 91 of the 327, four of them on the
main line and flagged for the vtable lane.
Corrects my own first reading of the fleet-creation call: a ret-N tail-call
thunk in the middle of an argument list makes three pushes look like they
belong to the wrong call. Checking ret N against the push count catches it.
The honest limit stands: none of this has ever executed under an instrument.
combat-resolver.md section 10.3's workload now needs a second condition -- the
battle must produce a retreat, or all six phases are no-ops.
The standalone now models the turn's dominant generator cost -- 16 of a measured 18-22
words -- and lands 4 and 2 short of the two calibrated pairs, which is exactly the
per-call-site ledger's split for those turns. The state block is byte-identical; only
left differs. The answer to 'does it match the oracle' is no, by a stated amount, and
tools/rng_oracle_check.py is the instrument that says so.
The tail's last phase is modelled for the six turn-record fields recoverable from the
wire and checked against the record the game itself archived: 480 fields over 80
player-records, 0 mismatches. It stays blocked; --commit-blocked shows exactly which
five fields are missing and what they cost.
By-product, and probably worth more than the phase: the stored bankruptcy elimination
limit is injective in the maximum-income sum it is built from, so every save states the
per-system output term that blocks ComputeBudget. tools/max_income_oracle.py inverts it
-- 25 player-records over the corpus -- and recovers the protection factor as 3.3 from
the saves rather than from the data files. It also shows the engine's -0.15 divisor
disagrees with the game on 6 of those 25.
divergence unchanged: 209->204 and 108->103, 5 closed / 0 regressed on both pairs.
FUN_00893290 is ServerTradeManager::GenerateTradeRaidEncounters --
ServerTradeManagerImpl vftable slot 10 -- rolling Chance(TRADE_RAID_ODDS_PLAYER
= 0.2) and Chance(TRADE_RAID_ODDS_NPC = 0.05) once per player. Both are
strictly inside (0,1) so each is exactly one word, and no back-edge contains
either site, so one word per player per site is a hard bound.
Why no sweep found it: zero direct calls to it exist in the image and its only
reference is a vtable slot. The dispatch is a "call edx" through slot 10 at
0x007d8469 inside DetectEncounters -- one instruction before the DIRECT call
that lane I's closure did follow. Lane I's inventory is not wrong; its stated
caveat about indirect edges was load-bearing, and this is what it was hiding.
strategic-turn-internals.md line 153 had already named 0x00893290 "raid
encounter generation" against these exact StrategyVars. What was missing was
that it is where a turn's RNG goes.
Ghidra's size is wrong again: real body 1546 bytes ending 0x0089389a, reported
1532, ending mid-instruction. Rule 17, third time.
Seven entry points detoured, each call keyed by __builtin_return_address(0)
with the word cost from left before/after. Three consecutive turns on
ref-turn2: site sums 19/18/20 against independently measured ProcessTurn totals
of 19/18/20, residual 0 every time. The 18-20 spread is now explained rather
than reported -- it is the two gated research draws.
The dominant consumer is FUN_00893290: two Chance calls per player across all
eight player-vector entries, 16 of every turn's 18-20 words, and it is NOT one
of lane I's 22 sites. Lane I said its closure covered direct edges only and
that indirect reachability was unsettled; this is that gap, measured. The
function is unidentified and is the highest-value target left.
Two bookkeeping corrections are in the report tool, not the shim: helper-
internal rows (Chance's own NextFloat) double-count, and 8 calls per turn are
on the StrategyClient's generator, not the strategic one. The first build did
not distinguish generators and reported 44 words against a bracket of 18 --
which is what caught it. A per-site ledger that cannot say which generator a
draw came from is not a ledger.
tools/standalone_report.py drives sots-engine's sots_turn over each
consecutive-turn save pair and diffs the result against the game's own
post-turn save with state_checksum.py, which localises to named leaves and
proves its own coverage by re-serialisation.
turn1-state -> turn2-state baseline 209 diverging, after 204, closed 5
turn2-state -> turn3-state baseline 108 diverging, after 103, closed 5
regressed 0 on both
`regressed` is reported next to `closed` and never netted off. It earned its
place immediately: committing the phase-31 player-status restore turned two
agreeing leaves into disagreeing ones, because the phase writes 1 and the file
carries 4.
The stable-system stand-in feeding the colony pass is a labelled hypothesis and
it survived a changed workload -- the same 3 ntdev leaves closed on both pairs,
six agreements, zero disagreements.
Two things deliberately NOT implemented: the TShn/ltis counters (18 leaves, a
`+1` would close them, but "+1 across one observed turn" is a hypothesis, not a
reading), and the RNG state write-back (an advanced-but-incomplete generator is
wrong in a different way from an untouched one).
dashboard.py gains section 6, reading verify/results/standalone/status.json:
phases modelled/committed per driver, baseline vs after, closed vs regressed,
the subsystem breakdown of what still differs, and the RNG gap. Sections 6-8
renumbered to 7-9; the delta footer tracks the two new counts.
DASHBOARD_README.md documents every number.
findings/control-flow/standalone-scaffold.md has the ranked blocker list.
Predicted at turn 34 with the run in flight, from min_life falling by exactly
1 per turn: the first phase-11 draw on turn 64, exactly 1 word, tail total 1,
bracket = ProcessTurn + 1. The game was played to turn 64 and every clause
held. predict_words, computed before the original ran, said 1 and the
measurement said 1 -- a real check of the model, against 63 preceding turns
where 0 matched 0 and checked nothing.
So the defect lane K warned about is no longer latent: on that turn a
reimplementation modelling ProcessTurn perfectly would have written an autosave
one word out of step.
And the instrument's thinnest part ran live on the same turn -- ProcessTurn
crossed a block boundary (left 11 -> 615, one twist, 20 words) and the bracket
still reconciled to residual 0.
A Von Neumann encounter at Gallandro on turn 54 gave the workload the finding
said did not exist. Auto-resolved, with P10 committed before the click.
P10 predicted a non-zero tail cost and was wrong: res_no_battle flipped to 0
for the first time in 55 turns, the fleet was destroyed, and the generator
moved by zero. The bracket residual stayed 0, so combat proper drew nothing
either -- all 22 words were inside ProcessTurn, exactly as on a peaceful turn.
That is the strong form of lane J's static reading, and it means a
reimplementation can model a turn's RNG while modelling nothing about combat.
One auto-resolved encounter against an NPC is not combat in general, and 10.2
says so at length.
The primitive count went three -> four (this lane) -> seven (lane I) while this
measurement was being taken, and not one number in the ledger moved. That is
the argument for reading state instead of counting calls, stated where it is
now demonstrable rather than merely asserted.
StrategyServer::Write tags both words itself: S+0x8 is ModCount and S+0xc is
Frame. addresses.json has the name on the wrong word and lane T's
PhaseCounter is the one the wire calls ModCount. The saves confirm it
independently -- ModCount 0/12/24 across turn1/2/3-state, 241/412 across Zuul
16/23 -- and those deltas are exactly the 12-44 per turn measured live. So the
'writer nobody has identified' question dissolves: it is a modification
counter, it scales with the empire, and there is no single writer to find.
The players=8 flag is withdrawn. The offset is right, pinned by the ctor's
four-vector enumeration at 0x0085b120 with no frame arithmetic needed, and the
count is right: the vector is empires + one rebel-AI per empire species + four
NPC pseudo-players, so 8 on the Human saves and 7 on the Zuul ones against a
lobby that says 2 in both. My draft claimed the hook read 8 on both saves. It
read 7 on the Zuul one. I generalised from one run without re-reading the
other, and a check aimed at something else caught it.
Re-ran lane J's image-wide tempering-immediate scan at real instruction
boundaries and audited it site by site. Sixteen functions carry the two masks
inside a decoded instruction, 67 occurrences, and a brute byte scan finds zero
orphans -- recall is complete. Of the sixteen:
* ONE IS A FALSE POSITIVE. 0x008cca30 has no temper chain at all; the four
bytes read as the second mask are the rel32 displacement of a call.
* FOUR ARE RNG ENTRY POINTS, not game code -- the tempering there is the
primitive's own. Two were known; 0x004f7670 and 0x008e6e30 were not.
So the figure is ELEVEN game functions with inlined draws over 28 sites, not
fourteen. Exactly ONE of the eleven is reachable from StrategyServer::ProcessTurn
(0x007aa240, depth 4) and one more from OnAllCombatDone_Tail (lane J's R2). The
other nine are map setup, the lobby, the network layer and two scripted
encounters, all reached through vtable slots with no direct caller -- so their
absence from the turn closure is proved for direct edges only, and that caveat
is stated as loudly as the result.
Both functions lane J handed over are read completely from the instruction
stream:
0x004f7670 (84 B) is Mars::RNG::NextUInt -- ONE WORD, UNCONDITIONAL, no loop,
no branch but the lazy twist. ECX is the generator OBJECT, where NextFloat
and NextInt take the object PLUS FOUR; ProbabilisticJump uses both conventions
0x6b bytes apart. Ghidra's size is right here, which is worth saying.
0x007aa240 (Ghidra says 944; the body is 953 and ends past the reported range)
is the encounter-detection roll. ONE INLINED NextFloat PER (contact, detector)
TRIAL, drawn BEFORE the accept test, so a detector holding neither of two
specific techs still burns a word and can never succeed. The accept test is
`thresh >= r` -- equality accepts -- derived from the fcompp/test ah,5/jp
encoding rather than the mnemonic. The outer repeat-until-no-progress loop
cannot redraw a pair: the "tried" bitset is filled above the back-edge target
and never cleared, so the whole call is bounded by |contacts| x |detectors|.
Three more draw entry points nobody had listed: a float range (one word, and it
NARROWS TWICE), a triangular integer range (at least two words), and a
truncated-normal range whose two draws are BOTH inlined and which costs two
words per attempt with an unbounded attempt count -- and which scales by 2^-32
where NextFloat scales by 1/(2^32-1). Two divisors, one image.
RECONCILIATION, stated honestly. The complete draw-site inventory of the
ProcessTurn closure is 22 sites: 21 entry-point calls plus the one inlined site.
This lane adds two previously-uncounted sources to that list and accounts for
NONE of lane Z's 18-20 words per turn with certainty, because both new sources
are gated and neither has been measured. Lane J's prediction that these two
functions would explain the gap is NOT confirmed. What is now provable is the
negative: there is no twenty-third mechanism, so the 18-20 words are distributed
among exactly these 22 sites. The search space closes; the count does not.
Also corrects, in place: my own Ghidra comment claiming the masks are a Mars
variant of MT19937. They are the textbook masks applied before the shift
instead of after -- (y & 0xff3a58ad) << 7 == (y << 7) & 0x9d2c5680, verified
over 200k words -- so mars::rng was never wrong, but a scan for the textbook
constants finds nothing in this image.
Fragment validated by generating to a scratch path (797 entries, no duplicate
name); the tracked header is untouched while lane Z is in flight. Eight
prototypes, nine plate comments and eight pre-comments written back to Ghidra.
The second save's numbers were not in the first draft's table. Correcting my
own correction: on a turn-19 Zuul game the counter moves 16, 21 and 44 times
between ProcessTurn entries, against 12-14 on an early two-colony game. So it
is not a driver-invocation counter and not a constant either.
Lane J landed rule 16 (inlined draws are invisible to call-graph sweeps) while
this run was in flight, and it bears directly on three claims here that rested
on direct-call sweeps. Those claims now rest on the behavioural measurement
instead, which is immune to it: ProcessNodeSpaceTravel moved the generator by
0 words on 16 observations and node-line decay on 8. The instrument does not
ask which function drew, only whether the generator moved.
Lane J's resolver map and this ledger pair up: the resolver has no
unconditional draw, so its prediction -- a plain fleet battle costs the same
18-22 words as a peaceful turn -- is testable with these hooks as soon as
someone builds a save where two hostile fleets meet.
We consume 18-22 generator words per turn and model none of them as a count.
All of it is inside StrategyServer::ProcessTurn; OnAllCombatDone_Tail costs 0
on every turn observed; the residual outside the two drivers is exactly 0. The
generator does not move between turns at all, so the interval a standalone has
to reproduce is closed at both ends.
The instrument reads generator STATE, not calls, and that choice paid: the
image has four draw entry points, not three (NextUInt 0x004f7670 is in no
lane's primitive set) plus inlined draws in twelve functions, two reachable
from the turn roots. A primitive-counting hook would have undercounted
silently.
Checked against the save files independently: the turn-6 autosave pair gives
18 words read from the two Sim.RNG blobs, and with twists == 0 that number
never passes through a twist implementation -- so the two instruments do not
share the hidden assumption they could have.
Corrections to combat-done-tail.md, in place:
* the node-line 0x20000-fleet check runs AFTER the Chance(0.5f) call and
cannot gate the draw; the expiry test is NodePath::RemainingLife 0x006e2130
and is now a formula rather than a description
* StrategyHost::Autosave is ret 8 and returns the std::string* in EAX
* SNMAllCombatDone IS delivered every End Turn (8 of 8) -- lane K's inference
was right; the stronger no-encounter reading is narrowed, not closed
* S+0x8 advances 12-14 times per turn, not twice
Node-line decay still has not fired. The hook reports the distance instead of
the absence: 51 of 53 lines are permanent, the mortal ones are dug ~1/turn by
the Zuul, each ~40 turns from expiry. It stays a labelled hypothesis.
