An independent review of 4f44894 accepted the audit with two required evidence
changes, neither of which needed a code change.
"Classification is not a topic-name heuristic" cited a lane-order test that
never varies a topic name. The row is now conforms-by-construction, naming the
four scheduler functions that read only the queue an item sits in, and
a_topic_named_like_a_notice_is_still_classified_as_topic_data publishes on
topics called call.failed, route.removed and subscription.closed and asserts
each arrives as a topic.message delivery with its payload intact.
"A latest subscriber never causes BACKPRESSURE" cited a bounded-mode test and
the ignored measurement. a_latest_subscriber_never_refuses_a_publication floods
one unconsumed latest slot with 100 publications of 60 KB, six times the
per-client bounded byte pool, and asserts none is refused, 98 coalesce, the
queue stays at one and the credit never comes back. That row also underwrites
the byte-budget deviation and the first contradiction.
Both tests run over both transports.
The coordinator resolved both contradictions in the spec rather than the code,
so bus-v1 carries them as dated amendments with one line of reason each: the
section 9 table row becomes "Per-client ordinary bounded queued envelope bytes"
with a new "Latest subscription slots | subscriptions x 64 KiB" row, and the
section 2 sketch drops the budget argument and shows the deadline at the caller.
With the amended wording the byte-budget row conforms, so the report's counts
are 178 / 9 / 1 fixed / 7, and the crate README's differences 4 and 8 say they
no longer differ.
bus-conformance.md audits the flybus crate against bus-v1 sections 2 to 11, one
row per normative sentence: requirement, status, code location, the test that
proves it. 195 rows, 177 conforming, 10 deviating with the sentence that allows
each, 1 must-fix (the teardown starvation, fixed in this branch) and 7 not
implemented with an owner named. It also maps every BUS-01/02/03 acceptance
bullet to its test, reconciles all ten of the crate's own differences from the
draft, records the frame measurement with the reasons it is not a capacity
claim, and lists the two contradictions inside the draft it will not guess at:
the per-client queued byte budget against the latest-mode guarantee, and
section 2's call budget against section 6's client-owned deadline. Neither
changed any code.
bus-v1 gains section 12: dated amendments for the three error codes the
implementation needs and the draft left unnamed (CONFLICT, NO_TOPIC,
ARTIFACT_MISMATCH), one line of reason each, and for the one operation it adds
(rpc.responder.release), which is how bounded call correlation ends when a
handler keeps reply authority after releasing the request delivery. Section 9's
error list is inclusive, and section 4 already provides for a digest change.
The crate README points at the report, carries the new measurement summary in
place of the old numbers, and describes the two new test files; the design index
and the flybus index point at the report too.
What was live, what the survey read, and what the three candidate
readings in the brief turned out to be: not the prompt, not HEAL, but the
dialog pad dealt unconditionally with TALK to get back into it. The
scene-by-scene table splits the dialog row in two and the pad-empty sweep
gains the reopen ledger's own residual. macros-wram.md narrows its "no
observable for a choice" claim rather than withdrawing it.
The rung-10 loop whole: which building the fly was in, why every candidate list
on that map emptied, the byte dump that named the battle menu's swapped entries,
the ROM-gated before and after, and the two arms of the trap hunt being identical
because a restore clears the ledgers the loop was built out of.
Section 13.1's tables follow: MENU off both overworld rows and off the narrow
counter row, the move list's conditional BACK, the start menu reachable only by
the raw START button, and two new rows in the pad-empty audit - the room whose
one door the ledger rests, and the map with no way out at all, which is the one
empty pad left and is asserted rather than covered.
The contract: no pair of buttons on any battle pad may undo each other with
nothing else changing, which is section 12.2's rule stated at the pad instead
of at one macro. Section 13.1's table takes NEXT off the own-turn main menu,
gives the bag a row of its own on the own turn, and records MOVE 1 as the
backstop that row keeps.
The audit carries the reproduction -- 71,673 frames in one battle, 73 of 73
windows flagged, BACK 739 starts on the move list against NEXT 739 on the main
menu -- the ROM-gated run before and after, the trap hunt before and after
(1 distinct tile to 260, 73 of 73 flagged windows to 68 of 73, 0 overworld
frames to 20,394), and the residuals: NEXT on a move list whose cursor the seam
cannot place is now the largest source of it, which is row 30b and wants a WRAM
reading rather than a pad change.
286 distinct tiles become 489 over twenty brain minutes from the rung-9
checkpoint, the median flagged window holds 55 tiles instead of 16, GO FRONTIER
runs 64 walks worth up to twelve net tiles instead of four worth one, and one
walk spends its cap where six did.
The cost is named rather than buried: flagged windows go 61 to 70 and windows
under four tiles 5 to 14, and every one of those is a window spent inside a
battle -- a fly that covers more ground walks into more grass, 48,756 battle
frames becoming 50,413 with the longest battle 9,549 frames becoming 13,411.
This is the first measurement in that file where more ground and fewer flags do
not both hold, and it is stated as such.
Section 15 is the contract for map-aware walks: what is decoded, the one ROM
read and why it is a read of the cartridge image, what the window fallback is
for and how it says so, and the proof. macros-wram.md section 9 is the bytes --
four addresses with their encodings, the bank-aware read on the seam, the corner
the cartridge settled, the two gates against a plausible-but-wrong decode, and
the survey of Pallet Town and Viridian Forest.
The rung-9 forest review: what was live, the mechanism of all three
observations, the audit rows, and the trap hunt before and after from the
release container's own checkpoint.
The hunt is brain-driven rather than stubbed, which is legitimate here and
was not for sections 13 and 14: this branch adds no macro type, so no
population is re-dealt and the two arms differ in the macro code alone.
Distinct tiles 216 to 286, windows flagged 70 of 73 to 61, windows under
four tiles 21 to 5, BACK starts with no list open 175 to 0, MOVE n starts
36 to 68.
Four residuals are named rather than buried: BACK is still 359 starts of
830 over open lists, which is row 34's contract; a NEXT/BACK two-cycle
closes the run inside one battle, from a move list whose cursor the seam
cannot place on its opening frames; a window spent in a battle is flagged
by the tile rule whatever happens in it; and the THROW BALL precondition
is inert in this run because the save carries a party of one.
Row 41 is the loop behind this one: in the before arm the fly answered the
nurse's box YES 474 times on one tile of a Pokemon Center for the last
eight brain minutes of the run. The after arm never enters it, so it is
neither reproduced nor fixed here. It is the next thing to measure.
