The two pending decisions, taken for the feed with EDGE-01 and dated:
sizing from the measured 122,367-byte snapshot (the frame is 92,160 bytes,
not the 1.2 MB the list assumed) with the worst case of seven stuck latest
subscribers at about 3 MB inside a 32 MiB tmpfs store; and the lifecycle,
flysim owning the router under /run/fly/bus and starting first, the edge
After= and Requires= it and reconnecting by itself across a crash. Plus the
design as built, the tour's pointer, the example config and the flybus
README's no-longer-true line.
An independent review of 4f44894 accepted the audit with two required evidence
changes, neither of which needed a code change.
"Classification is not a topic-name heuristic" cited a lane-order test that
never varies a topic name. The row is now conforms-by-construction, naming the
four scheduler functions that read only the queue an item sits in, and
a_topic_named_like_a_notice_is_still_classified_as_topic_data publishes on
topics called call.failed, route.removed and subscription.closed and asserts
each arrives as a topic.message delivery with its payload intact.
"A latest subscriber never causes BACKPRESSURE" cited a bounded-mode test and
the ignored measurement. a_latest_subscriber_never_refuses_a_publication floods
one unconsumed latest slot with 100 publications of 60 KB, six times the
per-client bounded byte pool, and asserts none is refused, 98 coalesce, the
queue stays at one and the credit never comes back. That row also underwrites
the byte-budget deviation and the first contradiction.
Both tests run over both transports.
The coordinator resolved both contradictions in the spec rather than the code,
so bus-v1 carries them as dated amendments with one line of reason each: the
section 9 table row becomes "Per-client ordinary bounded queued envelope bytes"
with a new "Latest subscription slots | subscriptions x 64 KiB" row, and the
section 2 sketch drops the budget argument and shows the deadline at the caller.
With the amended wording the byte-budget row conforms, so the report's counts
are 178 / 9 / 1 fixed / 7, and the crate README's differences 4 and 8 say they
no longer differ.
bus-conformance.md audits the flybus crate against bus-v1 sections 2 to 11, one
row per normative sentence: requirement, status, code location, the test that
proves it. 195 rows, 177 conforming, 10 deviating with the sentence that allows
each, 1 must-fix (the teardown starvation, fixed in this branch) and 7 not
implemented with an owner named. It also maps every BUS-01/02/03 acceptance
bullet to its test, reconciles all ten of the crate's own differences from the
draft, records the frame measurement with the reasons it is not a capacity
claim, and lists the two contradictions inside the draft it will not guess at:
the per-client queued byte budget against the latest-mode guarantee, and
section 2's call budget against section 6's client-owned deadline. Neither
changed any code.
bus-v1 gains section 12: dated amendments for the three error codes the
implementation needs and the draft left unnamed (CONFLICT, NO_TOPIC,
ARTIFACT_MISMATCH), one line of reason each, and for the one operation it adds
(rpc.responder.release), which is how bounded call correlation ends when a
handler keeps reply authority after releasing the request delivery. Section 9's
error list is inclusive, and section 4 already provides for a digest change.
The crate README points at the report, carries the new measurement summary in
place of the old numbers, and describes the two new test files; the design index
and the flybus index point at the report too.
